Ian Allan
I like our “Experts Poll” competition, in which various fantasy analysts submit their top 20 players at each position and then are graded based on how those players perform. It’s been around since 1991.
But the oldest and most respected of the leagues featuring expert v. expert competition is hosted by the Fanex consortium. It was the brainchild, I believe, of Terry Cannon and Greg Kellogg, and they started that competition in 1996. It features 24 analysts competing in two separate head-to-head leagues. Plus they’ve got a separate 12-team league (chosen mostly from the same field of 24) with competition in a best-ball, total points format (with no roster moves allowed).
These leagues are fun, and they offer a glimpse of how the various expert-type guys view the players. The Fanex Analysis Draft – or “FAD” competition – is usually held in late May or early June, so it’s the first draft that many fantasy leaguers see as they start to get ready for their own drafts. And the 24-team league is fun to participate in as well.
I just got an e-mail from the guys at Fanex. After totaling votes from the participants, they’re making an interesting change to their format.
In the past (for their head-to-head league), they’ve had two separate 12-team leagues. One would hold a live draft lasting about three hours, the other would have an “online” draft, with each owner given 6 hours to pick (with the whole deal lasting about three weeks). Teams would play 14-game schedules, then the top four teams in each conference would make the playoffs. The championship game would then be played in week 17 (which can be problematic, with some of the top-level players getting held out that week).
Now, however, Fanex is going to two entirely separate leagues. The top 12 teams will compete in a “Super League”, and the other 12 will compete in a slightly lesser league. And each year, the top four teams in the second league will be promoted into in the top league – like what they do with the soccer leagues in Europe.
The overall Fanex champion will be the winner of the “first division” type league. The top four teams will make the playoffs in that league, and the playoff games will be held in weeks 15-16. The other teams in that league, of course, will have to work hard to avoid finishing in the bottom four (those teams will be relegated into the second tier).
I like these changes. I think they will pump some added energy and interest into this competion. (I’m also a little nervous about the shift in format; I don’t want to finish in bottom four in this competition, because that would result in having to sit out at least one year of the top-level league before getting back in).
The initial league placements, of course, were problematic – how to decide on which guys get to start in the Super League, and which have to start in the second group. Eventually, a BCS-style system was approved, with each owner getting credit for all-time wins, career winning percentage and order of finish in 2008. So it’s a balance of how well each guy has performed, with extra credit given for longevity. There really is no true fair way to set up this kind of thing, but it will sort itself out over the next few years.
FANEX 2009 LEAGUE ASSIGNMENTS
(with BCS points shown -- rank in three different categories)
Fanex Super League
13 Ian Allan
20 Duane Cahill
25 Mark Nulty
26 Jim Butler
26 Brady Tinker
29 Tony Holm
31 Greg Kellogg
32 Craig Davis
34 Carlos Panizo
35 Jerome Hickerson
35 Mike Perlow
35 Chris Rito
Fanex Standard League
38 John Georgopoulos
38 Scott McClory
41 Phil Gentles
43 Terry Cannon
43 Mike Harmon
44 Brian Hulett
44 Matt Pitzer
46 Chris Dolfi
46 Shannon O’Leary
53 Scott Engel
63 Jeff Christianson
65 Paul Charchian
I’m not exactly sure how they’ll divide these teams up into four-team divisions. I believe they’ll go with a 1-6-7-12, 2-5-8-11, 3-4-9-10 arrangement, meaning I’ll likely be in a four-team group with Tony Holm, Greg Kellogg and Chris Rito. Holm is the lead writer for the www.fantasysharks.com website (not “www.draftsharks.com”, which is the Lenny Pappano site – there are two different shark-based sites). Kellogg has done some work for the fantasy section of the Sports Illustrated site. Rito has worked for various sites, including Fantasy Football Mastermind and Footballguys.com. That would be a pretty tough division. But I'm just guessing what the divisions might be. Rito, for example, finished with the same points totals as Mike Perlow and Jerome Hickerson, so it's possible he'll be in the No. 10 or 11 spot -- and I'm not even sure they'll seed the divisions anyway.
- Comments [0]
Readers' Comments
Add a Comment
Already a registered user? Please sign in to add comments.
To add comments, you must become a registered user of our site. To register, please click here.


