A:

I’ve studied this a little. You will hear people say that running backs burn out at 30. But I don’t think that’s true. I think they tend to burn out at 31 or 32. The way guys train and take care of their bodies, I don’t consider a 30-year-old to be a high-risk player. By my count, in the last 15 years we’ve seen 14 different players run for 1,000-plus yards at the age of 30 – it happens almost every year. But only seven guys at age 31 and only three at 32. And none who were older than 32. Thomas Jones could to mind as a guy who was fine at 31 (1,402 yards) but simply doesn’t have it anymore. In the case of Jackson, he hasn’t played that much or taken a beating, so I would expect he’ll be fine at age 31 next year. It will be 2013 when I would expect he’d be moved back into a part-time role. I will post a chart showing all runners who were 30-plus years old later today or tomorrow.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I think he’s been preoccupied with his contract situation. Supposedly, there was some kind of intervention where teammates called him out over it. I think he’s pretty much radioactive now. I can’t imagine any team would give him a big deal. So fantasy-wise, I think he has very limited value. He’s going to miss the cherry game against the Rams this weekend. Then they’ve got Jacksonville; I don’t know if he plays in that one either. After that, the schedule gets remarkably difficult. The Browns are at Cincinnati, who rank 2nd in run defense, then four of their last five are against the Ravens and Steelers. I

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

Thanks for passing that along. I’ve never seen an All-22 tape. It's an interesting deal. I'd like to take a peak at one of them. But I'm not sure if I would be knowledgeable enough football-wise for an All-22 tape to help with fantasy analysis. My guess is that it would take somebody really good with Xs and Os to pull anything out of that All-22 tape to create a fantasy advantage. For me personally, the only thing I could think of using the All-22 for personnally would be to track some of these shutdown type corners. It would make it possible to check every play what a guy like Darrelle Revis, Joe Haden or Ike Taylor is doing. Are those guys following one receiver on every play? Or are they tending to play who lines up on their side?

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

It’s worth thinking about, but I see your league doesn’t use Week 17. That’s the week where you might be most nervous of all about losing Rodgers. I’m not concerned at all about Rodgers opting out of Week 14-15. So he’s at least a guy who could get you to your championship game. With Roethlisberger, the team has its bye in Week 11 – he’s definitely not playing there. And Pittsburgh is at San Francisco in Week 15, which could be a really tough situation for him.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I would go with Brandon Jacobs. Ahmad Bradshaw has the stress fracture in his foot, so there’s really no telling how much the team will be able to get out of him the rest of the way. When Bradshaw is out, Jacobs should be pretty good as a full-time type back.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

According to my projections, Brady is worth about 1.5 points per game more than Roethlisberger, while Johnson is worth about 2.5 points than Fitzgerald. So the Roethlisberger-Johnson side seems to come out ahead. But you would need to have a quarterback to fill in for Week 11, which helps to even it. (Roethlisberger is the only player in that group who hasn’t yet had his bye.)

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

There will be Thursday games the rest of the year, so we’ve revised our schedule. The product will come out on Wednesday the rest of the way. This is before any of the teams release their initial injury reports, so there will be more changes in the rankings when we release our Friday supplement. But at least people will get something in their hands and have time to mull lineup decisions and waiver moves.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

It looks like Hakeem Nicks (hamstring) will play, so that will help Manning close the gap some. I will re-examine those guys and release updated projections later today. When I did the original projection for Manning, I wasn’t sure if Nicks would play.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

Fitzgerald, I think, will be the best of those three. Arizona’s schedule gets a lot easier in the second half of the season. Austin has a hamstring injury that will keep him out until December, so he has limited value at this point.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I would stay with the Arizona defense over any of the three you mentioned. Patrick Peterson has scored on 3 punt returns; he’s a threat. And the Cardinals have good matchups in two of those three weeks you mention (at home against the Browns and Seahawks).

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I like Nelson. The kind of numbers they’re putting up in Green Bay, you know he’s going to have some good games. But I would be nervous about getting rid of Lynch. The Seahawks are starting to get their running game going. Note that they’ve still got two games left against the Rams, who rank last in run defense.

• Comments
• Add Comment