A:

You'll be very happy with Henry. The Broncos still have a terrific system for running backs, and he's a much, much better runner than the guys they've put back there recently -- Mike Anderson, Quentin Griffin, Reuben Droughns and the two Bells. Henry won't make a big impact as a pass catcher, but he should rack up plenty of rushing yards and touchdowns, beginning on opening day against one of his former teams (Buffalo, which has a notoriously weak run defense).

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

You don't see a lot of head coaches getting replaced during the season. By my count, it's happened nine times in the last 10 years.

2000 Bruce Coslet (Cincinnati) after 3 games

2000 Vince Tobin (Arizona) 7 games

2000 Norv Turner (Washington) 13 games

2001 Dennis Green (Minnesota) 15 games

2003 Dan Reeves (Atlanta) 13 games

2004 Dave Wannstedt (Miami) 9 games

2004 Butch Davis (Cleveland) 11 games

2005 Mike Martz (St. Louis) 5 games (medical leave)

2005 Steve Mariucci (Detroit) 11 games

I agree that Tom Coughlin is the coach with the best chance of getting fired before the 2007 season is even over. He's a solid coach in my opinion, but if the season heads south for the team, a change could make sense. Back in 2003, when it was apparent Jim Fassel wasn't going to be back, the Giants essentially mailed it in for the second half of the season. I don't see any other coaches with much of a chance of being replaced before the end of the season. Guys who are definitely on the hot seat would include Jon Gruden, Rod Marinelli, Romeo Crennel and Jack Del Rio.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I consider only two teams to be shoo-ins to win their divisions: New England and Chicago. In the AFC, I believe the Jaguars could press the Colts, and the Broncos could move past the Chargers. The North appears to be the most wide-open on the AFC side; I'll go with Cincinnati edging Baltimore and Pittsburgh. In the NFC, I expect the Cowboys to overtake the Eagles in the East. I believe the Saints will hold off the Panthers in the South. And in the West, the Seahawks deserve to be slight favorites, but either the 49ers or Rams could overtake them; I'm going with the Rams.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I'm going to leave rushing production out of it. I think that's the way most leagues do it, and you didn't mention how much a rushing TD went for anyway. Teams I expect to put up the best passing numbers (in order): Colts, Sants, Rams, Eagles, Patriots, Bengals, Lions, Cowboys, Seahawks, Packers, Steelers, Chargers, Cardinals, Bears, Panthers.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I thought Tarvaris Jackson actually looked pretty good in the exhibition game up here against the Seahawks last week. He threw the ball pretty well. I was surprised how many balls he completed against Marcus Trufant, who's supposed to be the shut-down cornerback for Seattle. So in picking up Kelly Holcomb, I think the Vikings are just adding some depth and insurance. Brooks Bollinger is not a backup-quality quarterback. Should Holcomb actually wind up on the field, I would expect his passing numbers would be a little better than Jackson's. Holcomb is more experienced, and he's never been afraid to stand in there and zing it. He throws more interceptions than the typical quarterback, but he also completes more passes downfield.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

Sorry. I don't see it. I'm projecting him to be more of just a regular guy. I'm projecting 30 quarterbacks to start at least 10 games. Of that group, Campbell comes in at No. 25 in expected per-game production. I'm forecasting that he'll be at 202 total yards per game (187 passing and 14 rushing), with 18.8 total TDs if he can stay in the lineup for 16 games. But if you've got a good feeling about him, by all means grab him to be your team's backup quarterback.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I wouldn't worry too much about it. I prefer to spread things out, making scores more balanced. But in this case, you've got a pair of big-time talents that aren't as valued by the rest of your league. The guys in your league apparently don't believe that Owens is going to be a top-3 receiver or that Romo is going to be one of the top half dozen quarterbacks. So I wouldn't be willing to trade either one of them away for a lesser player, just to make your team more balanced. Instead, I suggest you hang with those players for a while. After they've established that they're legit, then perhaps you can re-visit the idea of exchanging one of them for a similar talent from a different NFL team.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I suspect those guys will share time all year. Taylor isn't as talented as Peterson, but he's a capable, experienced back. As long as he stays healthy, I expect you'll see him get 30-40 percent of the workload. That's why we don't have Peterson higher.

• Comments
• Add Comment