A:

It’s a possibility. With that running ability (and you go 1 point for every 10 rushing yards, no?) I see Griffin as a guy who can get you an average of 3-4 points per week at the quarterback position. Manning doesn’t run. The package of Griffin-Fitzpatrick at quarterback is better than Manning-Fitzpatrick. But you need a third running back. Foster and Charles both have byes coming up. Charles underwent knee surgery last year. Morris is a good third option (a guy who can start ahead of Charles at times). But this is a PPR format, and Morris isn’t a factor at all in the passing game. After four weeks, he’s sitting at 1 reception for minus-4 yards. That’s huge. From a gut feel, you may think Morris is a top-10 or top-15 back, but when you run the numbers and account for the absence of any receiving production, he might turn out to be more of only a top-20 or top-25 back. I suggest you work the phones. Can you bring in a third running back in exchange for Manning? If so, then I would pull the trigger. Griffin is taking way too much punishment, so there’s a real possibility he gets hurt at some point, but Fitzpatrick is good enough to hold down that backup spot.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I remember your letter. You argued that since Marshall caught 4 TDs in the Pro Bowl, he should be ranked higher. I don’t give any weight to the Pro Bowl when grading players – not something that should move a guy up or down on a board. It’s essentially a touch football game. Not any different than a guy perhaps catching 4 TDs in one of those beach football games that DirecTV puts on everyone once in a while. But I will concede that Marshall thus far has clearly been better than Bryant. I expected more of a breakout-type season for Bryant. Occasionally he’ll make a catch that makes you think he might be another Randy Moss type guy, and there are times it looks like the Cowboys are trying to get the ball into his hands and make him their go-to, No. 1 option. In particular, look at the one-handed touchdown catch in the back of the end zone against San Diego. But it hasn’t translated into the real games, and Bryant has been plagued by drops and mental errors. Now the whole team seems to be in trouble. I will look at the rankings of those two guys. One factor that will skew things towards Bryant when comparing those two: the Cowboys have already had their bye. So when comparing them over the next 10 weeks, one guy (Marshall) is going to play 9 games, while the other (Bryant) is going to play 10. That’s a 10-percent difference.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

I would keep Jackson. He will be more of a factor as a pass catcher, and he seems to be rounding into form. He ran for 76 yards on 18 carries last night against Arizona. He hasn’t scored yet, but he’s coming close. He had a touchdown nullified by a penalty against Seattle, and he another lost in Week 2 on a blown spot by the replacement officials. Contrast that to Williams. He’s running behind a really bad offensive line (Arizona’s line might be even worse than the Rams’). He’s run for 26 and 33 yards in the two games he’s started, averaging 2.2 yards per attempt. He missed most of the fourth quarter last night after suffering a shoulder injury. I’m not sure if he’ll play next week.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

Strength of schedule, at least for targeted weeks, isn’t included in the redrafter. Some owners, such as yourself, might be interested in Weeks 14-16. Others might be interested in just Week 15 or only Week 15. Others might be focused on just making the playoffs – maybe they’re more in interested in Weeks 5-13 or Weeks 5-14. Some leagues go through Week 17 and some leagues don’t even have playoffs. So we’re just looking at overall value for the remaining games. At this time of year, one issue becomes the byes. How much more valuable, do you think, is a player who’s already had his bye? Suppose, for example, you see the Steelers and Bills defenses as interchangeable. Pittsburgh has already had its bye, so it would make sense to rank it higher. But do you want it a full game higher? There are 13 weeks, so one game right now equals about 8 percent of value. Should Pittsburgh be ranked 8 percent based on having already had its bye? This isn’t just at defense, of course, it’s every position. On my board, I soften the impact of the byes by about 50 percent. When a defense (like Pittsburgh) actually has 13 games left, I change it to 12.6 games, and while changing the teams with remaining byes (like Buffalo) to 12.2 games. So on our board, it’s an advantage (on the overall board) to have the bye remaining, but just not as much.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

Both, I think. I see Ridley as the No. 1 back there, but if you own him, it makes sense to have Bolden around as a contingency plan. Maybe Ridley gets hurt or starts fumbling.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

For this week, it’s definitely Hixon. Going forward, I would probably take Hixon, figuring that it’s possible Nicks’ foot and knee injuries will continue. If Nicks is out, Hixon could be a top-20 receiver. I don’t see Green Bay having enough injuries to allow Cobb to get in the top 20.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

If you’re starting three receivers, then I think you definitely hang onto Decker. You will need the depth. Amendola just got hurt. Garcon has the foot issue which could plague him all year. Floyd could decline if Meachem rounds into form or if Vincent Brown comes back healthy and makes an impact. If you’re starting two wide receivers, then I would lean towards making that deal.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

Thanks for the tip. We’ll work on it.

• Comments
• Add Comment

A:

Haden won’t play. He was suspended, recall, by the league for four games. He was able to play in the first game because he was appealing. He will re-join the team on Monday.

• Comments
• Add Comment