Members

Ian Allan's Mailbag

Back to homepage

Posted Oct. 26 at 09:28 AM

Publisher Ian Allan fields your questions on strategy, how to run your league, player ratings -- and whatever else you think of. Updated every Friday during the season; Tuesdays and Fridays during the last two months of the preseason. You must be registered and signed-in to submit a mailbag question. After you sign in at the top of the page, the link to submit a mailbag question will become visible.



Question 1:

What's the official scoring on the Vikings defensive TD? 50-yard fumble return or 28-yard fumble return? Of course, it is the difference between 12 and 6 fantasy points.


JAY MORGAN [VERONA, WI]

A:

Here's what happened: Patrick Crayton caught the ball and fumbled at the Minnesota 43. Ben Leber picked it up at the 40 and ran to midfield. Lateraled to Cedric Griffin. Griffin ran 9 yards to the Dallas 41 and fumbled. The ball bounced/rolled down to the Dallas 28, where Griffin scooped it up and ran the remaining 28 yards for a touchdown. In the official box score, posted at NFL.com, it shows as a 28-yard touchdown. But it's actually a 50-yard touchdown. That's definitely how it would be scored on a passing or running play. (That is, if Adrian Peterson ran 9 yards to the 41, fumbled, then picked the bouncing ball up at the 28, it would be scored as Peterson scoring on a 50-yard TD run. If Troy Williamson caught a pass, ran to the 41, fumbled and recovered it a the 28 and scored, it would be graded as Williamson catching a 50-yard touchdown pass). The NFL has an official handbook for scoring such plays. GUIDE FOR STATISTICIANS, they call it. In there, they write, "When a player recovers his own fumble, credit him with net yardage gained or lost on the play in the category initiating the action." This statistical handbook cites the following example: "Player receives kickoff at the 10, advances to the 20, where he is tackled and fumbles. He recovers the ball on the 25 and advances to the 30. Scoring: Player is credited with a return of 20 yards." This is the same deal. I called the guys at the Elias Sports Bureau (the NFL's statistical arm) for confirmation. They've got it as a 50-yard fumble return in their books. I'm not sure if the revision will make it onto NFL.com or not. But definitely a 50-yard fumble return, and definitely 6 more points for the Verona fantasy franchises.


Question 2:

Aargh ... what's up with this Kenton Keith stuff? Is this just the Colts easing Addai back into game action, or should I (as an Addai owner) be sufficiently concerned here? I'm currently flush with RBs, with Addai, Purple Jesus and Portis. I planned on quietly picking up Keith later on down the stretch to handcuff Addai, but now my hand has been forced as another owner has put Keith on the waiver wire this week. Do you think I should explore moving Portis for an upgrade at WR and then bid aggressively on Keith, or am I just overanalyzing and should stand pat with the 3 strong RBs I have?


Matt Tinker [ORLEANS, VT]

A:

I don't consider Portis to be a strong running back. He's run for 43-72 yards five weeks in a row. He's not that durable. And he might score only half of Washington's rushing touchdowns the rest of the way. You're never going to start him ahead of Addai or Peterson. I would move Portis and pick up Keith. That will give you insurance should Addai go down. There's also the possibility that Tony Dungy will rest Addai the final couple weeks of the season. Keith is your guy. Dungy, by the way, indicates that he's going to continue using Keith as a change-of-pace runner to help keep Addai healthy and fresh. Maybe Keith gets 10 touches in a lot of games.


Question 3:

Next year, I am contemplating starting, due to all of the injuries to running backs and running back committees, a fantasy league where you start 1 QB, 1 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE, 2 FLEX (RB/WR/TE, even QB), 1 DEF, and 1 Kicker. It would be a regular 10- or 12-team league. I have a 12-team league now and people are either just stockpiling running backs or have so many injuries they have to start scrubs. I figure it would add more flexibility to their lineups. What do you suggest?


Johnny Rocket [Hartsville, TN]

A:

I like the idea of being able to use more flex players. It would make the early rounds of drafts more interesting, when you'd be left weighing the upside of running backs versus the safety of selecting proven wide receivers, who don't tend to miss as many games with injuries. But I don't know all the pros and cons of such a format. I've never been in a league with more than one flex player.


Question 4:

I play in a total points league. I am currently in first place, 83 points ahead of the pack. I have been offered Carson Palmer for Tony Romo. I have T.J. Houshmandzadeh. I also have Patrick Crayton. Please lend me your thoughts on this trade?


Paul Reed [CLIVE, IA]

A:

Palmer will play one more game than Romo. And the Bengals have an easier remaining schedule. Their remaining games are against teams that are currently a combined 26-38, versus 31-25 for Dallas. And Palmer could get a boost from Chris Henry returning in week 10. On my board, I've got them posting similar passing statistics -- slight edge to Palmer -- but Romo also offering production as a runner. As we near the halfway point of the season, Romo is at 81 rushing yards and 2 TD runs. Palmer is down at 11 rushing yards, with no touchdowns. Palmer has run for only 2 TDs in 51 career starts.


Question 5:

I am looking to get rid of Shaun Alexander because he looks more tentative and older each week. The O-Line is providing for him, and the Seahawks are finding other options in the running game. Would it be worth it to trade Portis or Shaun Alexander straight up for Boldin? Boldin always gets the TDs and his schedule (along with Shaun's) is pretty favorable. I already have Edge, Portis, Alexander, Housh, and Santonio Holmes and you get to start 2 RBs, 2 WRs and 1 flex. No PPR.


Robert Sjoberg [Seattle, WA]

A:

I'll agree that it looks like Alexander is running soft. A couple of times this year, I've seen him hit the deck without anyone even touching him. He just turned 30; maybe he's slowing down. He's playing with a cast on his broken (left) hand. That could be a factor. Or maybe he's just happy with the big contract he got last year. Regardless, it doesn't look like he's ever going to be that every-week scorer that he was in the past. Before you unload him, however, keep in mind that he's still clearly his team's best running option. He might score all of Seattle's rushing touchdowns during the final 10 weeks of the season. And the Seahawks play one of the easiest schedules the rest of the way. Seattle's remaining opponents are currently a combined 22-37, worst in the league. So despite his flaws, I'd be inclined to keep Alexander.


Question 6:

How good will Jesse Chatman be as a replacement for Ronnie Brown? I will be able to pick him up off of the waiver wire because I have the most money leftover in a bid system.


JOHN SHELBROCK [FRANKENMUTH, MI]

A:

I don't think Chatman is anything special as a runner. And he's playing on a team that's not going to win more than two games; those kind of teams don't tend to finish with many rushing yards or touchdowns. Nevertheless, I think Chatman has substantial value. The Dolphins right now are throwing more screen passes than any team in the league. And that potentially will really help Chatman, particularly in a PPR format. Miami's tailbacks so far have combined to catch 51 passes in seven games; that's over 7 per game. I take that as evidence that Chatman is going to catch 4-6 passes in a lot of games, and that should make him a valuable fantasy commodity.


Question 7:

Our league is looking for some new ideas to do pickups. During the week (Tuesday to Sunday) it is first come first serve which is not a problem......But from Sunday at noon until Tuesday at 7:59am we are locked out. At 8:00am our league's website will allow us to pick up again.....but many times we're all trying to pick up the same player and it is just luck to who gets in!!! Can you give us some other ideas?


DAMON DUHON [BATON ROUGE, LA]

A:

In my league, we stay shut down from the kickoff of the first game on Sunday until Thursday afternoon. At that time, every team submits bids for players. High bidder gets him. And from that point on (Friday, Saturday and Sunday morning), players are available on a first-come, first-serve basis. In running a weekly mini-auction, you can either give each team a $1,000 payroll -- once you spend all your money, you can no longer pick up players -- or you can tie player bids to existing contracts (using a salary cap) if you used an auction rather than a draft.


Question 8:

I am commish of a 12-player league. This year, we want to change to a 1-player keeper format. My question is, how do you handle setting draft order in keeper leagues? I am thinking of giving people the option (to keep or not to keep) but am struggling, for those who do keep, to figure out what draft position to place them in. Any ideas?


Charles Mobraten [WOODSIDE, CA]

A:

If a league brings in the principal of allowing teams to protect 1 or 3 or however many players, then it's also time to move towards the same socialist system as the NFL, with the sine-wave draft getting chucked and the worst teams getting the highest draft slots -- in every round. If the team that selected LaDainian Tomlinson won it last year, they're picking last in every round. If you haven't yet begun this keeper league, you should consider initially going with some kind of auction setup. With an auction, unlike a draft, everyone gets a fair chance to get that player that they really have their heart set on.


Question 9:

I have a bye and an injury at the QB position and must go with either Cleo Lemon or Trent Edwards this week, who would you choose?


Brett Fulton [Maricopa, AZ]

A:

They're both lesser guys, of course, but I'll bet that a lot of teams have to settle for one of those guys this week, with six teams being on byes. Lemon has played fairly well two weeks in a row. He passed for 256 yards and 2 TDs at Cleveland, and he went 24 of 37 for 236 yards against the Patriots. Good scrambler, too. He ran for 73 yards against New England, and he's run for 3 TDs in two games. Edwards is a dink-and-dunk guy, but he'll face a soft secondary. He went 22 of 28 against the Jets a few weeks back. He's not as big of a threat to do anything as a runner, and the Bills may go with a run-based plan against New York's defense. I suggest you go with Edwards for the first half of your game, then sub in Lemon to get the superfluous numbers he'll pile up when the Dolphins are way behind.


Question 10:

What do think of Cecil Sapp as a starter for the Broncos, once Travis Henry begins his suspension?


Randall Weiss [MERRITT ISLAND, FL]

A:

I think Sapp will get more carries -- maybe 20-30 percent of the workload -- but that it will be Selvin Young being their main back. Travis Henry has bruised ribs, so they may be without him on Monday against Green Bay.


Question 11:

I have a couple wide receivers on bye this week, and need to choose between Marques Colston and Santana Moss. The numbers say edge to Colston because he's going against San Fran and Moss is going against New England, but I'm leaning towards Moss mostly because he could actually break out any time. New England has given up more touchdowns, but the 49ers have given up about 19 more yards per game. Any advice?


Doug Hall [Spanaway, Wash.]

A:

At some point, Moss will have one of those games with 130-plus yards and 2-3 TDs. But I wouldn't use him at this point. New England has a pretty tough defense, and Washington hasn't thrown a TD pass to a wide receiver -- any wide receiver -- all year.


Readers' Comments

Question 1: What's the official scoring on...

Posted by Eugene Hitt | Oct. 27 at 09:03 AM

Its dissapointing to see you answer this question at all. It seems like a "sit/start" question, of which i've been refered to the "weekly rankings" before.

Question 2: Aargh ... what's up with...

Posted by Ed Taylor | Oct. 26 at 09:56 AM

From Wenatchee WA - What is the latest on Chad Johnson's ankle? I just saw something today.

Question 3: Next year, I am contemplating...

Posted by MARTIN DONNELLY | Oct. 27 at 08:15 AM

Since I'm having a hard time with the premise that we lack interest in the early rounds of the draft, I would suggest to the petitioner that the opposite, in fact, is true. Eliminate all flex, defenses and kickers and go for a starting line-up of 1qb, 1rb, 2wr and 1te. The problem is the uselessness of the late rounds. And let's face it, there's not much interesting about having games decided because a kicker goes off or not -- the underlying offense stalls or not.

Question 5: I am looking to get...

Posted by William Petilli | Oct. 29 at 06:19 AM

Ian, I have edge and LJ.. should I be looking to move 1 of those guys. i have j.lewis on the bench along with a bunch of wr.. plax, owens, curtis, l.evans, s.holmes..

Question 7: Our league is looking for...

Posted by Michael Rogers | Oct. 27 at 10:01 PM

In our league, we pay actual money for free agents by secret bid. For example, I can bid $7.00 for Muhsin Muhammad. If nobody bids on him this week, I get him for $1.00 (real money). If somebody else bids $7.50 for him that team must pay $7.50 for him. This way, all teams have equal access to every free agent, whichever team wants the free agent bad enough will pay the most for him, and the total pot at the end of the year is far larger than it would be if it were just limited to the league dues at the beginning of the year. We have done this for years and everybody loves it. It actually surprises me that we seem to be one of the only leagues in existence that does this.

Question 7: Our league is looking for...

Posted by steve morganti | Oct. 26 at 11:31 PM

Our league uses CBSsportsline and we also use the message board to post add/drops. We instituted rules to discourage frequent waives -- 1) There is a fee for each transaction and 2) Added players must remain on your roster for 2 weeks. The 2 week rule keeps owners from picking up a backup player as soon as a starter is injured. It also makes the bye weeks a little more interesting.......

Question 7: Our league is looking for...

Posted by BRYAN BERTSCH | Oct. 26 at 09:22 PM

Kenneth - Thanks for your post on the message board drop-adds. Such a simple solution, I cannot believe we have gone this long just following our league host's rules for so long!

Question 7: Our league is looking for...

Posted by KENNETH SCHMITT | Oct. 26 at 03:05 PM

My league uses CBS sportline for our league. The site has a league message board. Once the week games begin and add/drop lock down, our owners can just post their add/drop to the message board (first come, first serve)and then the actual moves are made on Tuesday when the site opens up again. I suppose you could also accomplish this with an email to "everybody" for pick ups. The message board works great for us as our league desires the first come first serve at all times. The messages are time stamped and there has never been an issue.

Question 7: Our league is looking for...

Posted by BRYAN BERTSCH | Oct. 26 at 01:05 PM

Are you by chance ysing Fanball? Our league is supposed to be open drop-adds 24/7 7 days a week but Fanball locks all started players until their Live Scoring gets reset sometime Tuesday morning. This is frustrating when you start a guy that is a bye week fill-in who plays at noon and you can't drop him until Tuesday am. I have written to Fanball about that issue and I suggest you do the same.

Question 8: I am commish of a...

Posted by KENNETH SCHMITT | Oct. 26 at 03:13 PM

In our 10-team league we can keep one player each year. We cannot keep anybody that was drafted in the first 3 rounds. We cannot keep a player more than one extra year. Keeps the creame of the crop in the pot for everybody. The keeper player cost you the draft pick that he was taken the prior year. In our league the draft order is determined by last years finish. Champion drafts last each round, etc.

Question 8: I am commish of a...

Posted by Kevin Asbury | Oct. 29 at 02:38 PM

12 team, 13 week league. We are having Issues with finding accurate info about "Official injury report." Our pick ups are run on Friday nights and teams with an injured player goes first. Then it based on lowest points. We used the USA Today, which was set up that way back in the 90's when scoring was done by hand. An example of what our problem is this; This week on Friday morning when I gathered info for pick up's Rudi Johnson was listed as questionable, then on Saturday morning he was then listed as doubtful. This would have make a difference in what order the pick ups were done. It might seem trivial but its a real issue Finding reliable source of the "Official Injury Report"

Add a Comment

Already a registered user? Please sign in to add comments.

To add comments, you must become a registered user of our site. To register, please click here.

Fantasy Index Weekly

The week 6 edition of FANTASY INDEX WEEKLY is available now!

  • A no-name tight end to pick up in your league.
  • A nobody wide receiver who could help you this week.
  • A lesser running back who should put up surprising numbers this week.

Also

-- Notes for all 32 teams.
-- Analysis of all 16 games.
-- Forecasts for how every player will do in this week's games


Pick better starters with our weekend matchup preview. Learn which top players may be shut down and which sleepers may overachieve this week. Revised player rankings for each week's games for three scoring systems. One extra win per season may be the difference between finishing in the money and missing the playoffs.

Buy the Fantasy Index Weekly | Log In


Weekly


September 30 ReDrafter is available

The in-season version of the Fantasy Index Cheat Sheet -- the ReDrafter -- is perfect for scouting free agents and evaluating trade offers. Our September 9 cheat sheet includes revised season-long rankings, depth charts, rankings tailored to your scoring system, downloadable stat projections in Excel format and IDP cheat sheets. Only $3!

Buy the ReDrafter | Log In


Past Mailbags

Toolbox