Members

Ian Allan's Mailbag

Back to homepage

Posted Nov. 21 at 10:27 PM

Publisher Ian Allan fields your questions on strategy, how to run your league, player ratings -- and whatever else you think of. Updated every Friday during the season; Tuesdays and Fridays during the last two months of the preseason. You must be registered and signed-in to submit a mailbag question. After you sign in at the top of the page, the link to submit a mailbag question will become visible.



Question 1:

With the winter cold coming I was wondering how the weather affects your Thursday rankings? Is the forecast built into those, or are there adjustments that need to made before Sunday's games?


MATTHEW MOYLE [LAS VEGAS, NV]

A:

Weather definitely plays a factor. As it gets colder and windier, teams are forced to rely more on the run -- and less on the pass. That's not an old wives tale. It's strong enough statistically that it can be seen even when all of the stats (of games in all weather conditions) are mixed together. When you compare the first half of last season versus the second half, for example, you'll see that teams on average scored 1 more rushing touchdown (in those final eight games) and averaged 9 more rushing yards per game. With passing, it moved in the opposite direction: passing yards per game dropped from 221 to 217 gross yards per game, and TD passes fell from 10.6 (in those eight games) to 9.7. It's a big deal -- something we should hire a graduate student to spend a month dissecting. (The numbers above aren't "good weather" versus "bad weather", they're just the easy-to-obtain, all-encompassing numbers from the entire halves of the season, including games played in domes.) It's something that you should definitely keep an eye on in the final weeks of the season, especially in those games to be played in northern cities. We'll try to hit as many of those weather forecasts as possible in our late-week updates.


Question 2:

Question for sleepers and rookies next year. Can you rank the value for the following young players in a three-year keeper format? WR: Dwayne Jarrett, Steve Smith (NYG) Laurent Robinson, Troy Williamson, Vincent Jackson. And looking at trading rookie picks, are there any Lynch-type RBs other than McFadden in next year's rookie class?


JASON WILHELMSEN [SMYRNA, GA]

A:

Jarrett, I believe, isn't the right physical shape to play wide receiver in the NFL. He's huge, but he isn't fast enough, so he'll always have trouble getting open. The Jaguars have three receivers like that: Matt Jones, Ernest Wilford and Reggie Williams. Williamson drops too many balls; no value. Smith looked very good in the preseason, then he got hurt. I'd say he has about a 60-40 chance of starting ahead of Amani Toomer next season. Robinson might be a starter for the Falcons; he looks pretty good. And Jackson showed some real ability earlier in the year before fading when the Chargers traded for Chris Chambers. Bottom line: none of those guys can be counted on to ever develop into much of anything. If I had to pick one, it would be Smith.

As for runners in college, there are definitely some backs who might outproduce Darren McFadden next year.

Here in Seattle, we watched Jonathan Stewart run for 251 yards and 2 TDs against Washington a few weeks back. 230-pounder for Oregon who probably runs under 4.5. He'll probably be the 2nd back selected next spring. He'll be on national TV Saturday at UCLA. With Shaun Alexander right at the end of the road, the Seahawks may have interest in Stewart, and he should be available when they pick around No. 20.

Rashard Mendenhall (Illinois) has been very good, running for 1,526 yards, scoring 18 TDs and averaging 6.2 yards per carry. He's listed at 224 pounds and has the same kind of speed.

And Steve Slaton (West Virginia) might wind up in the first round. He's a smaller back -- 195 pounds -- but he's fast and makes a lot of plays. He's scored 53 TDs in the last three years. And he can catch, too. Maybe he develops into another Tiki Barber.


Question 3:

Which Denver RB is more likely to be vastly overrated in your mag next year, leading to me selecting him much too early in the draft and trying to compensate the rest of the season by rolling the dice on ill-advised trades in an attempt to fill the gaping hole at RB on my roster created by a horrible early draft pick, Selvin Young or Andre Hall?


Frederick Buescher [COLUMBUS, OH]

A:

I don't think either Selvin Young or Andre Hall will be Denver's starting tailback next year. But we'll see how those guys play down the stretch; maybe one of them -- most likely, Young -- can work his way into consideration. Ever since Terrell Davis blew out his knee, it has been pretty crazy in Denver, with the best runners a lot of years coming out of almost nowhere. A look at Denver's expected starters (as of opening day) over the last 10 years:

1998 TERRELL DAVIS

2,225 total yards and 23 TDs. He did just fine.

1999 TERRELL DAVIS

Blows out knee. Olandis Gary runs for 1159 yards, 7 TDs.

2000 TERRELL DAVIS / OLANDIS GARY

Both get hurt. Mike Anderson runs for 1,487 yds, 15 TDs.

2001 TERRELL DAVIS / MIKE ANDERSON

Neither runs for more than 701 yards, 4 TDs

2002 CLINTON PORTIS

1,872 total yards, 17 TDs. Gary started first couple of games.

2003 CLINTON PORTIS

1,905 total yards, 14 TDs.

2004 QUENTIN GRIFFIN

Quickly benched. Reuben Droughns goes for 1,481, 8 TDs.

2005 MIKE ANDERSON

1,226 total yards, 13 TDs. Tatum Bell chips in 1,025 & 8 TDs.

2006 MIKE BELL

Runs for 677 & 8 TDs, Loses job to Tatum Bell (1,025 & 2)

2007 TRAVIS HENRY

645 total yards, 1 TD. Could be suspended for the season.

As you can see, it's been a pretty fluid situation. Unless the Broncos obtain some kind of can't-miss, game-breaking back in the offseason, I'm not sure you'll be able to count on any back there being a top-15 guy in 2008.


Question 4:

I'm leaving this decision up to you Ian. Our League leader decided he was too busy to put in his lineup on Sunday. He is ahead by miles due to dumb luck of having Brady and Moss. Our rules state that when this happens we are to use last weeks exact lineup. Of course now he's very unhappy because the Patriots were off last week and he's losing 90 points. I am in second place and this would help me at least make the last few weeks interesting. But I don't really want to chance winning due to this. But he has always been a lazy and absent owner but we never cared before because he sat in last all the time but he's finally winning and STILL CANNOT call in his team. Help!


Jason Obusek [TURTLE CREEK, PA]

A:

I think your rulebook speaks for itself. "When an owner doesn't submit a lineup, the previous week's exact lineup is used." There's not a lot of gray area there. I don't see a disclaimer that reads: "Unless the guy has Tom Brady on his roster, then that guy automatically gets Brady put into the lineup but the rest of the roster is frozen." If the guy wants to not send in a lineup, that's his problem, not the rest of the league. On a related, more interesting tangent, we have a similar rule in our league. But what to do -- and this has happened a few times -- if an owner releases or trades a player who was a starter the previous week, and then doesn't submit a lineup? You'll want to add verbage in there to handle that scenario. In our league, there are two camps. One wants affected starting spots simply left blank. The other maintains that the commissioner just rules what the lineup is, using the judgment of a reasonably prudent person. There are also fines in our league for not submitting lineups, even if the starting lineup is unchanged.


Question 5:

What effect if any will Trent Dilfer have on the fantasy prospects for 49er players?


Eric Schmit [KEIZER, OR]

A:

I think it's a small step in the right direction. Dilfer isn't anything special, but I don't think Alex Smith can play at all. Dilfer at least has thrown for 209 and 231 yards in his last two starts, with 2 TDs. And he had a game-tying touchdown dropped in the Rams game. Smith is completing less than 49 percent of his passes and has thrown for 150-plus yards in only two of his six complete games. The 49ers selected him with a No. 1 pick overall, but I don't think he's ever going to develop into a functional NFL starter.


Readers' Comments

Question 3: Which Denver RB is more...

Posted by NEAL BHARDWAJ | Nov. 22 at 09:46 PM

Frederick, I too have felt your pain with Ian's love for the Denver backfield. This year was suppose to be different according to Ian. We were sold that Travis Henry is a different back that has the cut-back ability and vision that others were lacking. After getting burned the last few years by Ian's overly zealous rankings of Denver RB's (I believe he had Henry in his top three overall this year), I passed on Henry in the first round of my draft. For those who read this and say that this is another Monday morning quarterback, it is quite the contrary, I am not the one who put Tatum Bell on the cover of the magazine in the past. Ian's love fest for Denver RB's has to stop. I love that his rankings for Travis Henry dropped dramatically after a the first few weeks in the season for a supposed top five player overall. It's unfair for Ian to even list Terrell Davis to answer this question. Terrell Davis was in a league of his own.

Question 3: Which Denver RB is more...

Posted by James NULTY | Nov. 23 at 08:48 AM

I was at my draft this year and had the third pick overall. I was all set to take Joesph Addai. Suddenly, Ian shows up and puts a gun to my head and FORCES me at gun point to take Travis Henry instead! Seriously, is it your teams or is it Ian's team? Every week I come in here someone complaining about a guy that Ian ranked higher than most people and how Ian's advice has ruined their season. I don't read Ian's work for his rankings, I read it for his analysis. Some of it I agree with. Some of it I don't. I find all of it well researched and thought provoking. But in the end, I make my own decisions as to what to do with it once I read it. Read the magazine and the updates. Weigh and evaluate the analysis Ian and others provide. Make adjustments based on your own observations and analysis. You are responsible for your own decisions and the effects on your team. Not Ian or anyone else.

Question 3: Which Denver RB is more...

Posted by ANDY RICHARDSON | Nov. 23 at 10:23 AM

I understand people who pay for information/prognostication being upset when it doesn't pan out. Henry, though, was doing fine before the injury and suspension stuff came up. As one of the league's leading rushers, he was certainly doing better than a lot of the backs most had ranked ahead of him. Sure, Henry has disappointed, but so have Gore, SJax, LJ, etc. I have a bias 'cause I write for these guys, but look at the players who you probably DON'T have on your team if you followed Index's rankings: Maroney, Norwood, Jacobs, Thomas Jones, Brandon Jackson. And some of the ones you do: Tony Romo, Brian Westbrook, Greg Jennings, T.J. Houshmandzadeh, Galloway, Burress... Yeah, there were the misses like Randy Moss and so forth, but most of my teams that used Index's rankings are doing pretty well.

Question 3: Which Denver RB is more...

Posted by NEAL BHARDWAJ | Nov. 23 at 12:32 PM

Andy, I agree that you and your fellow peers have done a great job overall. The Denver backfield has been a mess for a long time now. Mike Shanahan runs plays around the goaline that do not seem to favor the running backs, i.e. feeding the fullback the ball or play-action passes. Travis Henry even when healthy and didn't have the supsension looming, was not scoring TD's. Travis Henry has had a history of injuries throughout his career. As for Tatum Bell, let's not even get into that discussion........

Question 3: Which Denver RB is more...

Posted by Frederick Buescher | Nov. 23 at 01:51 PM

Relax James...The only thing more predictable than the posts skewering Ian on his rankings are the posts skewering people who complain about the rankings. All in good fun. More of an indictment of my own inability to ignore Shanatan and that vaunted running game then anyone's rankings. I promise myself every year, I won't do it again, I won't do it again...And then up comes my turn in Round 3 this year, and I can't help myself. Been the same story going all the way back to Quentin Griffin...

Question 3: Which Denver RB is more...

Posted by IAN ALLAN | Nov. 23 at 02:50 PM

"Shanatan." I like it. Did you coin that nickname on your own?

Question 3: Which Denver RB is more...

Posted by NEAL BHARDWAJ | Nov. 23 at 06:47 PM

Frederick, like Ian I too find "Shanatan" extremely funny. Ian, you are the man. I have to admit, when I heard that Travis Henry signed with the Broncos, I too was excited at his potential. I think this team will be looking for their next tailback in the offseason. It kind of reminds me of the quarterback position for my beloved hometown team Chicago Bears. It has been a revolving door since the mid-80's. They too will be looking for their next QB in the offseason. Check that, they need a new RB/offensive line/WR's. This team is in shambles.

Question 4: I'm leaving this decision up...

Posted by JOSH OBUSEK | Nov. 25 at 07:15 PM

Jason O, negligent owners should be booted as far as a Tom Dempsey FG!!!

Question 4: I'm leaving this decision up...

Posted by DAVID SMITH | Nov. 27 at 12:58 PM

A guy in our league did the same thing (he had Brady), didn't bother to send in a lineup. Then he had the nerve to claim he sent an e-mail to the owner he was playing (that would be me), and of course that owner (me) never got it. I didn't ask for it, but if he really sent it, he could go in his "send mail" file and dig it out and forward it to me and the commish.

Add a Comment

Already a registered user? Please sign in to add comments.

To add comments, you must become a registered user of our site. To register, please click here.

Fantasy Index Weekly

The August 4 Cheat Sheet Update is available now

Get our latest cheat sheet rankings, team-by-team analysis, and stat projections. Includes six different cheat sheets for three different scoring systems, plus team-by-team depth charts and defensive player analysis.

Buy Cheat Sheet Update | Log In


Fantasy Football Index 2008 is AVAILABLE NOW!

Fantasy Football Index includes 220 pages of player ratings, team analysis, stat projections, defensive player analysis, unique stat charts, sleeper picks, rule suggestions, offensive line analysis, and more. And don't forget to order your Fantasy Index Cheat Sheet Updates so they'll be ready and waiting when it's time for your draft or auction.

Sign up now and rule your draft with Fantasy Index Cheat Sheet Updates.

Subscribe now.

Past Mailbags

Toolbox