Jacksonville’s defense comes off a remarkably good season, and they’ve amassed an impressive bundle of talent. But does it make sense to select this defense three rounds before the others next summer in drafts?
The talent is impressive. The team has been bad for a lot of years, allowing them to draft a lot of good players. Jalen Ramsey and Dante Fowler are outstanding, and Myles Jack looks like a second-round steal. Jack might have been a top-5 pick, but there were questions about his knee. The strip-fumble of Dion Lewis on Sunday was probably the most impressive defensive play of the postseason.
They’ve also been investing in defensive free agents, and they’ve been hitting on those purchases. A.J. Bouye, Calais Campbell, Malik Jackson, Barry Church, Tashaun Gibson. This defense is stacked.
The Jaguars were remarkably productive in the regular season, with 8 touchdowns (including one on a punt return), 55 sacks and 33 takeaways.
Using standard basic fantasy scoring, Jacksonville scored 20 more points than any other team on defensive (and special teams) plays. In this century, only eight defenses have scored more points in a season.
I expect Jacksonville will rank in the top 3 on everyone’s draft board next summer. (Today, they would be No. 1 on mine.)
But history tells us that it’s tough for such defenses to actually come through and meet expectations. There’s roster turnover and injuries, some players will underperform, and opponents adjust game plans – when a defense is generating lots of sacks and interceptions, that affects game plans of opponents.
Since 2000, 42 other defenses have scored at least 150 points (fantasy points) in a season. Those great defenses than averaged 44 fewer points the next year. All but four of them scored at least 20 fewer points. Collectively, they averaged 3 fewer touchdowns, 6 fewer sacks and 9 fewer takeaways.
Of those 42 previous defenses that played really well, only 7 ranked in the top 5 in fantasy scoring the next year. That’s 1-in-6 – the same of picking up a dice and rolling it with the expectation of getting a specific number. Just over a third of those teams (15 of 42) at least ranked in the top 10. But nobody’s using an early pick on a defense hoping to rank 7th in scoring at that position.
I like the Jaguars. I find that I am more willing than most to be one of the first to select a kicker or defense if I feel there’s some value there. But my early guess is that in most fantasy leagues, there will be a couple of owners who are willing to select the Jaguars a little earlier than I will. For me, the price has to be right.
On the chart below, if a defense ranked in the top 10 the next year, it's got a black dot. If it ranked in the top 5, it's got an additional dot.
FANTASY DEFENSES WITH 150 POINTS | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Team | TD | Sack | Take | Points | Next | Rank |
2012 | • Chicago | 10 | 41 | 44 | 189 | 129 | 9 |
2000 | Denver | 9 | 44 | 44 | 188 | 125 | 13 |
2007 | San Diego | 8 | 42 | 48 | 186 | 102 | 16 |
2013 | Kansas City | 11 | 47 | 36 | 185 | 92 | 25 |
2004 | Buffalo | 10 | 45 | 39 | 185 | 112 | 19 |
2006 | •• Chicago | 9 | 40 | 44 | 184 | 157 | 2-3 |
2000 | • Tampa Bay | 7 | 55 | 41 | 181 | 144 | 6 |
2006 | Baltimore | 6 | 60 | 40 | 180 | 102 | 23 |
2017 | Jacksonville | 8 | 55 | 33 | 171 | ? | ? |
2014 | •• Philadelphia | 11 | 49 | 28 | 171 | 133 | 5 |
2009 | New Orleans | 9 | 35 | 39 | 167 | 97 | 24-26 |
2003 | •• New England | 7 | 41 | 41 | 167 | 147 | 4-5 |
2003 | St. Louis | 5 | 42 | 46 | 166 | 82 | 30 |
2000 | New Orleans | 5 | 66 | 35 | 166 | 121 | 14 |
2010 | • New England | 9 | 36 | 38 | 166 | 132 | 6 |
2003 | •• Baltimore | 6 | 47 | 41 | 165 | 161 | 2 |
2000 | Oakland | 7 | 43 | 37 | 163 | 119 | 15 |
2012 | New England | 7 | 37 | 41 | 163 | 124 | 11 |
2004 | Baltimore | 9 | 39 | 34 | 161 | 111 | 20 |
2002 | Philadelphia | 5 | 56 | 37 | 160 | 110 | 16 |
2001 | Chicago | 6 | 48 | 37 | 160 | 103 | 21 |
2009 | • Philadelphia | 6 | 44 | 38 | 160 | 125 | 10 |
2001 | Cleveland | 5 | 43 | 42 | 159 | 104 | 19-20 |
2002 | • Tampa Bay | 6 | 43 | 38 | 159 | 128 | 8-9 |
2007 | New England | 8 | 47 | 31 | 157 | 81 | 29 |
2002 | Green Bay | 4 | 43 | 45 | 157 | 116 | 13-14 |
2007 | • Chicago | 8 | 41 | 33 | 157 | 130 | 6-7 |
2001 | •• Green Bay | 4 | 52 | 39 | 156 | 157 | 3 |
2007 | • Minnesota | 9 | 38 | 31 | 156 | 125 | 10 |
2011 | Detroit | 7 | 41 | 34 | 153 | 70 | 29 |
2000 | Baltimore | 3 | 35 | 49 | 153 | 113 | 21-22 |
2010 | Arizona | 10 | 33 | 30 | 153 | 104 | 18-19 |
2003 | Kansas City | 7 | 36 | 37 | 152 | 104 | 20-22 |
2012 | Denver | 8 | 52 | 24 | 152 | 123 | 12 |
2001 | • New England | 7 | 40 | 35 | 152 | 128 | 10 |
2000 | Tennessee | 6 | 55 | 30 | 151 | 106 | 24 |
2002 | New Orleans | 6 | 39 | 38 | 151 | 106 | 19 |
2017 | Baltimore | 7 | 41 | 34 | 151 | ? | ? |
2011 | •• Chicago | 9 | 33 | 31 | 151 | 189 | 1 |
2003 | Tennessee | 7 | 38 | 34 | 150 | 104 | 20-22 |
2013 | Seattle | 4 | 44 | 39 | 150 | 105 | 18-21 |
2012 | San Diego | 9 | 38 | 28 | 150 | 75 | 31 |
2000 | Miami | 3 | 48 | 41 | 150 | 129 | 11 |
2008 | •• Philadelphia | 7 | 48 | 29 | 150 | 160 | 2 |
—Ian Allan