MINNESOTA (at Sea.): About 23 points seems like a fair estimate for the Vikings. That’s what’s indicated by the point spread (Minnesota favored by 3.5, with an over-under of 42.5).
The Vikings have an above-average offense, but one that’s tailed off some, scoring 25 touchdowns in their last 10 games). Seattle’s defense, meanwhile, is a little better than the season-long numbers suggest – it’s gotten better. Admittedly, the Seahawks were pushed around by Green Bay on Sunday night, but it’s a defense that’s allowed only 23 touchdowns in its last 10. So 2-3 TDs seems like the right number.
Let’s call it an average situation for Aaron Jones. The Seahawks rank 22nd against the run, but they’ve seemed to be above-average at times recently. Most notably, they held Arizona to only 49 rushing yards, and they limited the Rams to 68. Both of those games were at Lumen. The Packers came to this venue last week and ran for 140, but that was more a case of them being patient with the run, rather than simply pushing Seattle around (Josh Jacobs averaged only 3.6 per attempt). So something close to his usual makes sense. For the season, Jones is averaging 70 rushing and 23 receiving yards, with 7 TDs. He’s scored four weeks in a row, but this tends to be an offense that scores its touchdowns through the air (29 TD passes versus only 9 TD runs). Cam Akers got 10 carries off the bench Monday, including a touchdown, but most of that work came after the game had been settled.
Let’s lower expectations for Sam Darnold a notch this week. Seattle’s defense has improved as the season has progressed. It limited Aaron Rodgers to 185 yards three weeks ago, and it held Brock Purdy to 159 yards and a touchdown. Kyler Murray passed for 285 yards in this building, but with his offense managing only a pair of field goals. Weather will need to be looked into later in the week (for now, we’ll assume it’s not going to be a factor). But Darnold has been playing well enough that he tends to grade out as an above-average option. He’s averaged 252 passing yards in his 14 games, with 29 TDs. And the trends makes it look like he’ll be throwing multiple touchdowns. The Vikings have scored over 3 times as many touchdowns on passes rather than runs. They’ve scored at least 3 TDs in eight games this year, and they’ve scored more touchdowns passing than rushing in all but one of those games (the one on Monday night). Seattle’s defense, meanwhile, plays with a similar style. In its last 10 games, it’s allowed 17 TD passes versus only 6 TD runs.
If we’re agreeing that the passing numbers should be a little down this week, it makes sense to rank Justin Jefferson and Jordan Addison a little lower. That production needs to come from somewhere. But at the same time, these receivers generally are good enough that it’s tough to ever sit them down. Jefferson is about as good as anyone playing the position; he’s averaging 5.9 catches for 89 yards. He hasn’t been as elite as a touchdown scorer, but 3 of his 8 touchdowns have come in the last two games. Jefferson’s worst game, oddly, came in the game that you might have figured would have been his best – 48 yards against Jacksonville – demonstrating that one should be careful with “matchups” and the very best receivers. Addison is a notch back (he’s averaging 4.3 catches for 64 yards) but he’s actually outscored Jefferson 7-6 in the 12 games that both have been playing. And he’s been hot, going over 130 yards in two of his last four.
Jalen Nailor is their third receiver, but they don’t use him much (he’s caught only 11 passes and 2 TDs in his last 10 games).
T.J. Hockenson looks like a mid-level tight end, rather than the top-tier option he’s been in the past. He’s averaged 4.8 catches in his last six games, but with no touchdowns. He’s a chain mover between the 20s. Since he was activated, the team has thrown 15 touchdowns, and he hasn’t caught any of them (two of those touchdowns, however, have been thrown to other tight ends). This seems to be what Hockenson is nowadays; he’ll catch his 4-6 balls, but probably without a touchdown.
With Will Reichard leading the way, the Vikings have been one of the top half-dozen kicking teams for the bulk of the season, but such production looks unlikely this week. Seattle’s defense has improved dramatically over the last month-plus, and that extends to the kicker position.
The season-long numbers suggest the Vikings Defense will be the best in the league this week. It’s good in any week, of course, with only three teams having more sacks and only the Steelers having more takeaways. But these are areas where the Seahawks have struggled, with a problematic offensive line. Only two teams have allowed more sacks, and only five offenses have more turnovers. Geno Smith left the last game with a knee injury, and if it’s Sam Howell filling in, even better. Special teams is the one weak area; the Vikings are the only team that hasn’t had a 20-yard punt return or a 40-yard kickoff return.
This report is just a small snippet of the Week 16 edition of Fantasy Index Weekly, part of the In-Season Analyst Package. The newsletter includes our player rankings and 20-plus pages of matchup previews, plus stat projections and custom rankings for the games being played this weekend.
Subscribers: Log in! Not a subscriber yet? Sign for the month of December NOW.
11 Reader Comments:
Ben Hogevoll
Andy Richardson (Fantasy Index)
KC will have clinched the No. 1
Buffalo will be locked in as the No. 2
Houston will be the No. 4 (that one's pretty much definite -- they're winning the division, but not catching the other three teams)
Even the Chargers and Broncos might be locked in place as the 6 and 7 seeds, helping themselves to a bye by resting players
Baltimore-Pittsburgh, with one the 3 and one the 5, might be all that needs to be figured out for the AFC in Week 18
The NFC, I think, is more up in the air, with Eagles-Lions-Vikings-Packers all in the mix for top spots and just maybe the Rams still needing to win the NFC West. I think Tampa Bay might be locked in place as the 3 or 4, but they still need to hold off Atlanta.
Ben Hogevoll
Jose Montana
Jose Montana
Chase Grainger
QB - Love or Stafford - Pick one
I was leaning Stafford (pass oriented, but jekyll and hide offense), but weekly says Love (better match-up, but run oriented
0.5 PPR RB/WR - Pacheco, Harris, Flowers, Mooney, and/or Reed - Pick four
I was set on Pacheco, Harris, and Flowers (#1 options and more touches) and leaning Reed (better matchup, but inconsistent), but weekly says Mooney (more consistent, but new QB)
Thoughts?
Arthur Lindhjem (Fantasy Index)
If you are having issues with the fast-find feature, you may want to log out and log back in or try restarting your browser. If you are still having issues, email us customerservice@fantasyindex.com
Carter Maxwell
Scott Fitch
Weekly...Mixon #9. Uggh. Are we overvaluing him because of possibility he will catch the ball? KC falling apart? What gives here? I usually flex RBs in my 2 flex spots in PPR. I have Mixon. Breece, Tracy, Taylor and Charbonnet. I was ready to bench Mixon and flex DeVaonta Smith instead but now this ranking...
Jose Montana
Andy Richardson (Fantasy Index)
He’s averaging over 22 PPR points per week, so I don’t think we’re overvaluing him by projecting him for 18 or so in a tough matchup.
KC has a great defense. They’re probably going to hold Houston to 17-20 points tops. And if Mixon is healthy, as a full time, three down back — there aren’t many of those guys — he’ll probably run for 50-60 yards, catch 4 passes for 30 more, and maybe get in the end zone at some point (he has 12 of the 25 Houston has scored as a team when he’s playing). Doesn’t mean KC is falling apart, but I don’t think we should be sitting down franchise running backs against them or anything.
Neither Breece or Charbonnet practiced today so maybe you’ll be benching one of those guys.