Adam Thielen isn’t playing tonight. That should translate into more looks for other Minnesota players when the team is around the goal line – guys like Justin Jefferson and Tyler Conklin. But looking at the season-long numbers, those guys have been heavily used as is.
Thielen, of course, is a legend in that part of the field. He’s always had a strong rapport with Kirk Cousins in that area. Thielen caught 14 touchdowns last year, and inside the 10 this year, he’s caught 9 of the 10 passes thrown his way, including 6 TDs.
There have been 50 players this year who’ve seen at least 8 targets inside the 10, and only six of them have scored on at least half of their targets. Thielen is one of those guys, and the three other wide receivers who’ve done it are all guys who everyone was thinking about back in August – Evans, Hopkins, Hill. (Those six players are tagged with black dots.)
But Jefferson has been used a lot more in that part of the field than he was as a rookie. He’s seen 14 targets, in fact, tying for 3rd-most in the league. And Conklin has seen a healthy 8. With Thielen sidelined tonight, the odds of those guys being asked to make a big play around the goal line go up tonight. (And that’s also true for K.J. Osborn, who’l likely play a much bigger role.
Below see the stats for those 50 players. These are home-cooked numbers, and I’ve blended 2-point conversions in with the touchdowns. The final column shows the team totals.
| PLAYERS WITH 8 TARGETS INSIDE THE 10-YARD LINE | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | Tgt | No | TD | EZ% | Team |
| C.Kupp, LAR | 17 | 12 | 6 | 35% | 57-30-16 |
| C.Godwin, TB | 15 | 11 | 2 | 13% | 64-38-19 |
| S.Diggs, BUF | 14 | 8 | 4 | 29% | 51-33-16 |
| J.Jefferson, MIN | 14 | 7 | 3 | 21% | 40-25-14 |
| C.Claypool, PIT | 14 | 6 | 0 | 0% | 60-37-12 |
| P.Freiermuth, PIT | 13 | 11 | 6 | 46% | 60-37-12 |
| H.Renfrow, LV | 13 | 10 | 3 | 23% | 43-25-9 |
| M.Williams, LAC | 12 | 5 | 3 | 25% | 46-27-17 |
| D.Adams, GB | 12 | 8 | 3 | 25% | 47-27-12 |
| M.Andrews, BAL | 11 | 6 | 5 | 45% | 28-14-11 |
| K.Allen, LAC | 11 | 7 | 4 | 36% | 46-27-17 |
| R.Cobb, GB | 11 | 4 | 4 | 36% | 47-27-12 |
| T.Kelce, KC | 11 | 10 | 3 | 27% | 52-37-15 |
| J.Meyers, NE | 11 | 9 | 2 | 18% | 37-24-9 |
| C.Sutton, DEN | 11 | 6 | 1 | 9% | 43-21-9 |
| • A.Thielen, MIN | 10 | 9 | 6 | 60% | 40-25-14 |
| • M.Evans, TB | 10 | 8 | 6 | 60% | 64-38-19 |
| • D.Hopkins, ARI | 10 | 6 | 5 | 50% | 36-21-10 |
| • T.Hill, KC | 10 | 8 | 5 | 50% | 52-37-15 |
| J.Waddle, MIA | 10 | 7 | 4 | 40% | 52-33-17 |
| J.Chase, CIN | 10 | 6 | 3 | 30% | 38-25-13 |
| G.Bernard, TB | 10 | 7 | 3 | 30% | 64-38-19 |
| D.Waller, LV | 10 | 5 | 2 | 20% | 43-25-9 |
| M.Pittman, IND | 10 | 4 | 2 | 20% | 44-25-12 |
| Z.Pascal, IND | 10 | 4 | 2 | 20% | 44-25-12 |
| T.Higbee, LAR | 10 | 5 | 2 | 20% | 57-30-16 |
| D.Mooney, CHI | 10 | 4 | 1 | 10% | 29-14-6 |
| B.Cooks, HOU | 10 | 8 | 1 | 10% | 39-24-6 |
| V.Jefferson, LAR | 10 | 3 | 1 | 10% | 57-30-16 |
| • D.Knox, BUF | 9 | 7 | 5 | 56% | 51-33-16 |
| D.Moore, CAR | 9 | 7 | 4 | 44% | 30-18-9 |
| T.Hockenson, DET | 9 | 6 | 4 | 44% | 38-26-11 |
| J.Doyle, IND | 9 | 6 | 3 | 33% | 44-25-12 |
| D.Schultz, DAL | 9 | 8 | 3 | 33% | 47-31-13 |
| R.Woods, LAR | 9 | 5 | 3 | 33% | 57-30-16 |
| D.Johnson, PIT | 9 | 6 | 3 | 33% | 60-37-12 |
| A.Green, ARI | 9 | 3 | 1 | 11% | 36-21-10 |
| T.Patrick, DEN | 9 | 2 | 1 | 11% | 43-21-9 |
| K.Pitts, ATL | 9 | 3 | 1 | 11% | 48-27-10 |
| • H.Henry, NE | 8 | 5 | 4 | 50% | 37-24-9 |
| B.Aiyuk, SF | 8 | 4 | 3 | 38% | 32-14-9 |
| T.Higgins, CIN | 8 | 4 | 3 | 38% | 38-25-13 |
| T.Conklin, MIN | 8 | 5 | 3 | 38% | 40-25-14 |
| M.Gaskin, MIA | 8 | 5 | 3 | 38% | 52-33-17 |
| C.Lamb, DAL | 8 | 4 | 2 | 25% | 47-31-13 |
| C.Ridley, ATL | 8 | 6 | 2 | 25% | 48-27-10 |
| D.Johnson, HOU | 8 | 4 | 1 | 13% | 39-24-6 |
| J.Agnew, JAX | 8 | 4 | 1 | 13% | 41-19-6 |
| N.Harris, PIT | 8 | 5 | 1 | 13% | 60-37-12 |
| L.Shenault, JAX | 8 | 4 | 0 | 0% | 41-19-6 |
—Ian Allan
8 Reader Comments:
Paul Desimone
But I've got an off-topic quandary not unlike the start-or-don't-start Brady quandary. In Dynasty, I'm incredibly thin at QB. I've got Burrow (pinkie finger), Fields(ribs) and Lance (riding the pines). Yeah, got tired of the Wentz/Tannehill world, went young and started over.
Rankings seem almost meaningless- you would start Burrow under almost any circumstance. And according to Productions, I should lose by 40 points no matter which one I start. But if I win, I'm in.
I never start a q b with a throwing hand injury. Fields has upside, and a lot of downside. Bridgewater and Garoppolo or in the free-agent pile, but they're not really options for me (I don't want to shrink the margin and make it respectable, I want to win).
I'm leaning towards Fields in my personal Alamo.
Would you be so kind as to either back my call, talk me off the edge, or redirect me to boning up for fantasy baseball(which I've never played before).
Paul Desimone
John Ruppe
derek king
derek king
Ian Allan
GREG GRIMES
derek king