Fantasy Index

Around the NFL

Round 1 to KeAndre Lambert-Smith

Fifth-rounder shines in pro debut

KeAndre Lambert-Smith got my attention in the Hall of Fame game. He looks like he could be a factor for the Chargers.

Early in the game, Lambert-Smith got free down the right sideline for a 28-yard over-the-shoulder catch. And late in the half, he ran a slant route that resulted in a 15-yard touchdown.

The Chargers selected another wide receiver, Tre Harris, in the second round. Harris also played the entire first half. But Lambert-Smith was the more impressive wide receiver in this game. He passes the eyeball test, and you could reasonably conclude it’s going to be him, rather than Harris, who’s playing a bunch this year.

Both of these receivers were downfield threats for SEC teams last year. Harris finished with better numbers, catching 60 passes for 1,030 yards and 7 TDs for Ole Miss. In four more games, Lambert-Smith caught 10 fewer passes, for 981 yards, with 8 TDs. That’s 19.6 yards per catch for him, and 17.2 for Harris.

But Harris was playing in a more dynamic offense. The Rebels had a first-round quarterback and averaged 88 more passing yards per week.

Lambert-Smith is the faster of the two, running 4.37 at the combine. Harris ran only 4.54 (though he’s bigger and jumped 4 inches higher). If they’re looking to get some long plays out of one of these guys, I think Lambert-Smith is a better fit.

Finding good receivers in the fifth round is rare. But they show up from time to time. In the last 20 years, six receivers selected in the fifth round have had a top-12 season at some point in their career – Tyreek Hill, Stefon Diggs, Puka Nacua among guys who played last year.

Nine others have at least had a top-40 receiver during their career, including Darnell Mooney, Darius Slayton and Khalil Shakir. (That’s using PPR scoring). It’s early, but Lambert-Smith looks like he might develop into one of those kind of guys. If I were walking into a draft today (dynasty or otherwise), I would select Lambert-Smith before Harris.

The chart below shows the best seasons in the 32-team era by receivers chosen in the fifth round, using PPR scoring. I’m showing only the best season by each player (so just one listing for Tyreek Hill), and only two of these players are rookie (Nacus and Slayton).

BEST 5TH-ROUND WIDE RECEIVERS (since 2002)
YearPlayerRecYdsAvgTDPPRRk
2023Tyreek Hill, Mia.119179915.113378.42
2020Stefon Diggs, Buff.127153512.18328.63
2004Joe Horn, N.O.94139914.911301.92
2023Puka Nacua, LAR105148614.26298.54
2021Hunter Renfrow, L.V.103103810.19261.110
2017Marvin Jones, Det.61110118.19225.112
2021Darnell Mooney, Chi.81105513.04219.724
2008Steve Breaston, Ari.77100613.13196.425
2013Riley Cooper, Phil.4783517.88184.331
2024Khalil Shakir, Buff.7682110.84182.537
2017Kenny Stills, Mia.5884714.66178.726
2010Johnny Knox, Chi.5196018.85177.232
2019Darius Slayton, NYG4874015.48170.037
2012Denarius Moore, Oak.5174114.57166.639
2012Jeremy Kerley, NYJ5682714.82159.642
2021K.J. Osborn, Min.5065513.17158.540
2002Corey Bradford, Hou.4569715.56149.649
2008Justin Gage, Ten.3465119.26135.145
2008Bobby Wade, Min.5364512.22129.549

If you’re interested only in rookie numbers, things get leaner. There’s Nacus, Hill and Slayton, then a smattering of others making the top 60. Only 16 making the top 100.

5TH-ROUND ROOKIE RECEIVERS (since 2002)
YearPlayerRecYdsAvgTDPPRRk
2023Puka Nacua, LAR105148614.26298.54
2016Tyreek Hill, K.C.615939.76219.018
2019Darius Slayton, NYG4874015.48170.037
2020Darnell Mooney, Chi.6163110.34152.150
2015Stefon Diggs, Min.5272013.94149.347
2011Denarius Moore, Oak.3361818.75136.951
2009Johnny Knox, Chi.4552711.75133.751
2019Hunter Renfrow, Oak.4960512.44133.555
2013Kenny Stills, N.O.3264120.05127.156
2023Dontayvion Wicks, G.B.3958114.94121.957
2018Marquez Valdes-Scantling, G.B.3858115.32111.066
2016Tajae Sharpe, Ten.4152212.72105.373
2017Trent Taylor, S.F.4343010.0298.068
2011Jeremy Kerley, NYJ2931410.8171.391
2002Jason McAddley, Ari.2536214.5167.289
2003Justin Gage, Chi.1733819.9262.890

—Ian Allan

Older
Newer

Fantasy Index