With two weeks left in the regular season, the No. 1 pick of the draft is very much up in the air. The Jets took themselves out of serious consideration on Sunday by winning at Tennessee.
That leaves four teams with 2-12 records. The two teams from the AFC South (Jacksonville and Tampa Bay) and the two pirate franchises (Oakland and Tampa Bay).
Jacksonville and Tennessee play on Thursday, so at most one of those teams will go 2-14.
Oakland hosts Buffalo and Denver in its final two, while the Bucs host Green Bay and New Orleans. Both of those teams potentially could go 2-14.
If there’s a tie, recall, the tiebreaking for the draft order is different from tiebreaking for playoffs. All of that head-to-head and conference record stuff gets tossed out. For the draft, the first tiebreak (after won-loss records) is strength of schedule. So (for example) it’s possible for two teams in the same division to both finish 5-11, with one of the teams sweeping the other in the regular season and finishing 3rd inside the division. But if that team had an easier schedule than the 4th-place team, that easier-schedule team would then pick earlier in the draft.
Anyway, based on what the schedules look like, Tampa Bay looks like the front-runner for that No. 1 pick. It’s 16 opponents thus far are 106-115-3 – unlikely to be caught in the final two weeks by any of the other three 2-12 clubs.
The AFC South teams have played much easier schedules than the Raiders, so if there’s a 2-14 club in pair, it will pick in front of the Raiders, who have played the hardest schedule in the league.
Here’s the current strength of schedule numbers, with the 2-12 teams in bold.
STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE (Weeks 1-17) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Team | W | L | T | Pct |
Houston | 99 | 124 | 1 | .444 |
Dallas | 100 | 124 | 0 | .446 |
Pittsburgh | 100 | 121 | 3 | .453 |
Cleveland | 103 | 118 | 3 | .467 |
Detroit | 105 | 118 | 1 | .471 |
Indianapolis | 105 | 118 | 1 | .471 |
Baltimore | 104 | 117 | 3 | .471 |
Minnesota | 106 | 117 | 1 | .475 |
Philadelphia | 106 | 117 | 1 | .475 |
Tampa Bay | 106 | 115 | 3 | .480 |
New Orleans | 106 | 115 | 3 | .480 |
Green Bay | 108 | 115 | 1 | .484 |
Atlanta | 107 | 114 | 3 | .484 |
Tennessee | 110 | 113 | 1 | .493 |
Carolina | 110 | 113 | 1 | .493 |
Washington | 111 | 113 | 0 | .496 |
Cincinnati | 111 | 112 | 1 | .498 |
NY Giants | 114 | 110 | 0 | .509 |
Jacksonville | 114 | 109 | 1 | .511 |
Miami | 115 | 109 | 0 | .513 |
New England | 115 | 108 | 1 | .516 |
Buffalo | 116 | 108 | 0 | .518 |
Kansas City | 116 | 108 | 0 | .518 |
San Diego | 116 | 108 | 0 | .518 |
Chicago | 116 | 107 | 1 | .520 |
Arizona | 117 | 107 | 0 | .522 |
Denver | 118 | 105 | 1 | .529 |
Seattle | 119 | 104 | 1 | .533 |
St. Louis | 120 | 104 | 0 | .536 |
San Francisco | 121 | 103 | 0 | .540 |
NY Jets | 123 | 101 | 0 | .549 |
Oakland | 131 | 93 | 0 | .585 |
And here, by the way, are the strength of schedule numbers if you remove each team’s own wins and losses. With traditional strength of schedules, poor teams tend to be rewarded (their schedules tend to look harder) and good teams tends to be penalized (their schedules tend to look easier).
But not so much this time around. Oakland still has the hardest schedule, even after removing the fact that its opponents are 12-2 against them. The Bucs are the big mover up, going from the 10th-easiest schedule to the 2nd-easiest schedule.
STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE (Revised) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Team | Rk* | W | L | T | Pct |
Houston | 1 | 92 | 117 | 1 | .440 |
Tampa Bay | 10 | 94 | 113 | 3 | .455 |
Dallas | 2 | 96 | 114 | 0 | .457 |
Pittsburgh | 3 | 95 | 112 | 3 | .460 |
Cleveland | 4 | 96 | 111 | 3 | .464 |
Minnesota | 8 | 98 | 111 | 1 | .469 |
Tennessee | 14 | 98 | 111 | 1 | .469 |
New Orleans | 11 | 98 | 109 | 3 | .474 |
Atlanta | 13 | 98 | 109 | 3 | .474 |
Washington | 16 | 100 | 110 | 0 | .476 |
Baltimore | 7 | 99 | 108 | 3 | .479 |
Detroit | 5 | 101 | 108 | 1 | .483 |
Indianapolis | 6 | 101 | 108 | 1 | .483 |
Philadelphia | 9 | 101 | 108 | 1 | .483 |
Carolina | 15 | 102 | 108 | 0 | .486 |
Jacksonville | 19 | 102 | 107 | 1 | .488 |
Green Bay | 12 | 104 | 105 | 1 | .498 |
NY Giants | 18 | 105 | 105 | 0 | .500 |
Cincinnati | 17 | 107 | 103 | 0 | .510 |
Chicago | 25 | 107 | 102 | 1 | .512 |
Miami | 20 | 108 | 102 | 0 | .514 |
Buffalo | 22 | 110 | 100 | 0 | .524 |
Kansas City | 23 | 110 | 100 | 0 | .524 |
San Diego | 24 | 110 | 100 | 0 | .524 |
St. Louis | 29 | 112 | 98 | 0 | .533 |
NY Jets | 31 | 112 | 98 | 0 | .533 |
New England | 21 | 112 | 97 | 1 | .536 |
Arizona | 26 | 114 | 96 | 0 | .543 |
San Francisco | 30 | 114 | 96 | 0 | .543 |
Denver | 27 | 115 | 94 | 1 | .550 |
Seattle | 28 | 115 | 94 | 1 | .550 |
Oakland | 32 | 119 | 91 | 0 | .567 |
—Ian Allan