Fantasy Index

Active Banner
PLAYOFF CHEAT SHEETS ON SALE NOW.
SIGN UP

Scheduletron

Strength of schedule

What is the advantage of a so-called easy schedule?

I spent a little more time looking at Strength of Schedule. It had been a topic of discussion on Friday. I am not excited about the numbers. Probably best to just leave it alone.

The premise on this one was to look at whether one is better off focusing on records (W-L-T) or points when measuring strength of schedule. I looked at both, and don’t see much difference.

On this one, I focused on the 2002-2016 seasons – since the league moved to 32 teams.

I started by pulling out the three teams in each of those 15 seasons projecting to play the easiest schedules. That’s using points allowed by opponents in the previous season.

There are 45 teams in this group, and 16 of them went on to play schedules ranking in the top 25 percent (top 8). That’s for points – they played opponents that tended to allow a few more points. (See bold teams.) But 10 of these 45 teams had bottom-10 schedules. Their schedules were HARDER than expected (and I’ve got them flagged by black dots). Overall, the opponents for these schedules allowed an average of 22.36 points per game.

STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE -- POINTS (2002-2016)
YearTeamExp PtsRnkAct PtsRnk
2002• Jacksonville21.7121.224
2005Arizona22.7121.83
2013Denver24.0123.216
2014Indianapolis24.8122.815
2015Tampa Bay24.8122.917
2016• Dallas24.1122.026
2006• Pittsburgh21.8118.931
2012Atlanta24.4124.41
2003Chicago23.9122.41
2008San Francisco22.6123.64
2009Seattle23.8123.63
2004Tampa Bay22.3122.92
2007Carolina22.1121.815
2010Washington22.5122.810
2011Washington23.3122.912
2002• Pittsburgh21.4221.027
2009• San Francisco23.6219.331
2003Seattle23.8221.84
2015Carolina24.3223.312
2008New England22.4223.09
2005Philadelphia22.6220.815
2006• Miami21.7220.025
2012• New Orleans23.9222.126
2013Dallas23.5224.97
2004Denver22.0223.01
2014Detroit24.6223.54
2007Tampa Bay21.9222.74
2010Dallas22.5222.413
2016Minnesota23.7223.012
2011Tennessee23.1222.118
2009• Arizona23.3320.329
2002• Cincinnati21.2321.026
2015Atlanta24.3324.04
2008Buffalo22.4323.45
2005St. Louis22.6321.82
2014• Miami24.6321.629
2006Arizona21.6321.83
2013Kansas City23.4325.15
2007Atlanta21.8321.520
2016Chicago23.7322.815
2011Miami22.9323.010
2003Oakland23.3321.69
2010San Francisco22.5322.812
2012Tampa Bay23.7323.39
2004Tennessee21.8322.013

In the other corner, we’ve got wins and losses. I wanted to also have 45 teams, but that wasn’t possible (because of ties). So on this one, I went with all schedules where the opponents had a combined record of no better than 116-140. There were 47 such schedules, so only two off relative to the other group.

The overall scoring average is almost identical – 22.33. And the breakdown is pretty similar. Of the 47 teams, 16 (about a third) had easy schedules (in the top 8). And 8 teams had bottom-10 schedules.

Sixteen of these teams, by the way, are the same – appearing on both lists.

STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE -- POINTS (2002-2016)
YearTeamWLTPctAct PtsRnk
2008New England991570.38723.09
2015Atlanta1041502.41024.04
2009Chicago1051492.41422.713
2015Indianapolis1061491.41623.213
2015Houston1061482.41823.38
2009Minnesota1071481.42023.45
2008San Diego1081480.42222.615
2015Tampa Bay1081462.42622.917
2009Green Bay1091461.42823.82
2015New Orleans1091452.43023.66
2013Denver1101460.43023.216
2014Indianapolis1101460.43022.815
2009Pittsburgh1101442.43422.118
2015Carolina1111450.43423.312
2015Tennessee1111441.43623.39
2009Baltimore1111432.43823.64
2002Cleveland1121440.43821.716
2008Oakland1121440.43822.616
2014Tennessee1121440.43823.110
2002• Pittsburgh1131430.44121.027
2009• Arizona1131430.44120.329
2011• Arizona1131430.44121.025
2014Houston1131430.44124.01
2002Houston1131430.44121.419
2009• San Francisco1131421.44319.331
2003Seattle1131421.44321.84
2003Arizona1131421.44320.917
2002• Cincinnati1141420.44521.026
2005St. Louis1141420.44521.82
2006Chicago1141420.44521.38
2010Arizona1141420.44522.811
2008Denver1141420.44522.118
2009Cleveland1141402.44923.17
2002• Jacksonville1151410.44921.224
2005Arizona1151410.44921.83
2008Buffalo1151410.44923.45
2010St. Louis1151410.44923.56
2003Green Bay1151410.44921.511
2006Green Bay1151410.44920.716
2008New Orleans1151410.44922.712
2003San Francisco1151401.45121.215
2005Philadelphia1161400.45320.815
2012• New England1161400.45321.627
2014Jacksonville1161400.45323.55
2010San Diego1161400.45323.74
2008Kansas City1161400.45321.720
2010Seattle1161400.45322.315

So very little difference between the two, it seems. They’re about the same.

And as a final note, I looked at the average schedules from each year (the 30 ranking either 16th or 17th). That’s not entering the year, but what in reality happened. For those teams, they allowed an average of 22.0 points.

With the so-called easy schedules, we saw about 22.35 points. So we’re talking about an average of about a third of an NFL point per week. Over the course of a season, that’s adds up to just short of one touchdown – a 1.5 percent difference.

That’s the kind of “bonus” one can objectively expect from an easy schedule. The advantage would presumably become more pronounced if the numbers were re-run in September or October, when there is more current data on the teams. But SOS doesn’t look like the knockout silver bullet that will lift you to a championship.

—Ian Allan

Fantasy Index