I spent a little more time looking at Strength of Schedule. It had been a topic of discussion on Friday. I am not excited about the numbers. Probably best to just leave it alone.
The premise on this one was to look at whether one is better off focusing on records (W-L-T) or points when measuring strength of schedule. I looked at both, and don’t see much difference.
On this one, I focused on the 2002-2016 seasons – since the league moved to 32 teams.
I started by pulling out the three teams in each of those 15 seasons projecting to play the easiest schedules. That’s using points allowed by opponents in the previous season.
There are 45 teams in this group, and 16 of them went on to play schedules ranking in the top 25 percent (top 8). That’s for points – they played opponents that tended to allow a few more points. (See bold teams.) But 10 of these 45 teams had bottom-10 schedules. Their schedules were HARDER than expected (and I’ve got them flagged by black dots). Overall, the opponents for these schedules allowed an average of 22.36 points per game.
STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE -- POINTS (2002-2016) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Team | Exp Pts | Rnk | Act Pts | Rnk |
2002 | • Jacksonville | 21.7 | 1 | 21.2 | 24 |
2005 | Arizona | 22.7 | 1 | 21.8 | 3 |
2013 | Denver | 24.0 | 1 | 23.2 | 16 |
2014 | Indianapolis | 24.8 | 1 | 22.8 | 15 |
2015 | Tampa Bay | 24.8 | 1 | 22.9 | 17 |
2016 | • Dallas | 24.1 | 1 | 22.0 | 26 |
2006 | • Pittsburgh | 21.8 | 1 | 18.9 | 31 |
2012 | Atlanta | 24.4 | 1 | 24.4 | 1 |
2003 | Chicago | 23.9 | 1 | 22.4 | 1 |
2008 | San Francisco | 22.6 | 1 | 23.6 | 4 |
2009 | Seattle | 23.8 | 1 | 23.6 | 3 |
2004 | Tampa Bay | 22.3 | 1 | 22.9 | 2 |
2007 | Carolina | 22.1 | 1 | 21.8 | 15 |
2010 | Washington | 22.5 | 1 | 22.8 | 10 |
2011 | Washington | 23.3 | 1 | 22.9 | 12 |
2002 | • Pittsburgh | 21.4 | 2 | 21.0 | 27 |
2009 | • San Francisco | 23.6 | 2 | 19.3 | 31 |
2003 | Seattle | 23.8 | 2 | 21.8 | 4 |
2015 | Carolina | 24.3 | 2 | 23.3 | 12 |
2008 | New England | 22.4 | 2 | 23.0 | 9 |
2005 | Philadelphia | 22.6 | 2 | 20.8 | 15 |
2006 | • Miami | 21.7 | 2 | 20.0 | 25 |
2012 | • New Orleans | 23.9 | 2 | 22.1 | 26 |
2013 | Dallas | 23.5 | 2 | 24.9 | 7 |
2004 | Denver | 22.0 | 2 | 23.0 | 1 |
2014 | Detroit | 24.6 | 2 | 23.5 | 4 |
2007 | Tampa Bay | 21.9 | 2 | 22.7 | 4 |
2010 | Dallas | 22.5 | 2 | 22.4 | 13 |
2016 | Minnesota | 23.7 | 2 | 23.0 | 12 |
2011 | Tennessee | 23.1 | 2 | 22.1 | 18 |
2009 | • Arizona | 23.3 | 3 | 20.3 | 29 |
2002 | • Cincinnati | 21.2 | 3 | 21.0 | 26 |
2015 | Atlanta | 24.3 | 3 | 24.0 | 4 |
2008 | Buffalo | 22.4 | 3 | 23.4 | 5 |
2005 | St. Louis | 22.6 | 3 | 21.8 | 2 |
2014 | • Miami | 24.6 | 3 | 21.6 | 29 |
2006 | Arizona | 21.6 | 3 | 21.8 | 3 |
2013 | Kansas City | 23.4 | 3 | 25.1 | 5 |
2007 | Atlanta | 21.8 | 3 | 21.5 | 20 |
2016 | Chicago | 23.7 | 3 | 22.8 | 15 |
2011 | Miami | 22.9 | 3 | 23.0 | 10 |
2003 | Oakland | 23.3 | 3 | 21.6 | 9 |
2010 | San Francisco | 22.5 | 3 | 22.8 | 12 |
2012 | Tampa Bay | 23.7 | 3 | 23.3 | 9 |
2004 | Tennessee | 21.8 | 3 | 22.0 | 13 |
In the other corner, we’ve got wins and losses. I wanted to also have 45 teams, but that wasn’t possible (because of ties). So on this one, I went with all schedules where the opponents had a combined record of no better than 116-140. There were 47 such schedules, so only two off relative to the other group.
The overall scoring average is almost identical – 22.33. And the breakdown is pretty similar. Of the 47 teams, 16 (about a third) had easy schedules (in the top 8). And 8 teams had bottom-10 schedules.
Sixteen of these teams, by the way, are the same – appearing on both lists.
STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE -- POINTS (2002-2016) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Team | W | L | T | Pct | Act Pts | Rnk |
2008 | New England | 99 | 157 | 0 | .387 | 23.0 | 9 |
2015 | Atlanta | 104 | 150 | 2 | .410 | 24.0 | 4 |
2009 | Chicago | 105 | 149 | 2 | .414 | 22.7 | 13 |
2015 | Indianapolis | 106 | 149 | 1 | .416 | 23.2 | 13 |
2015 | Houston | 106 | 148 | 2 | .418 | 23.3 | 8 |
2009 | Minnesota | 107 | 148 | 1 | .420 | 23.4 | 5 |
2008 | San Diego | 108 | 148 | 0 | .422 | 22.6 | 15 |
2015 | Tampa Bay | 108 | 146 | 2 | .426 | 22.9 | 17 |
2009 | Green Bay | 109 | 146 | 1 | .428 | 23.8 | 2 |
2015 | New Orleans | 109 | 145 | 2 | .430 | 23.6 | 6 |
2013 | Denver | 110 | 146 | 0 | .430 | 23.2 | 16 |
2014 | Indianapolis | 110 | 146 | 0 | .430 | 22.8 | 15 |
2009 | Pittsburgh | 110 | 144 | 2 | .434 | 22.1 | 18 |
2015 | Carolina | 111 | 145 | 0 | .434 | 23.3 | 12 |
2015 | Tennessee | 111 | 144 | 1 | .436 | 23.3 | 9 |
2009 | Baltimore | 111 | 143 | 2 | .438 | 23.6 | 4 |
2002 | Cleveland | 112 | 144 | 0 | .438 | 21.7 | 16 |
2008 | Oakland | 112 | 144 | 0 | .438 | 22.6 | 16 |
2014 | Tennessee | 112 | 144 | 0 | .438 | 23.1 | 10 |
2002 | • Pittsburgh | 113 | 143 | 0 | .441 | 21.0 | 27 |
2009 | • Arizona | 113 | 143 | 0 | .441 | 20.3 | 29 |
2011 | • Arizona | 113 | 143 | 0 | .441 | 21.0 | 25 |
2014 | Houston | 113 | 143 | 0 | .441 | 24.0 | 1 |
2002 | Houston | 113 | 143 | 0 | .441 | 21.4 | 19 |
2009 | • San Francisco | 113 | 142 | 1 | .443 | 19.3 | 31 |
2003 | Seattle | 113 | 142 | 1 | .443 | 21.8 | 4 |
2003 | Arizona | 113 | 142 | 1 | .443 | 20.9 | 17 |
2002 | • Cincinnati | 114 | 142 | 0 | .445 | 21.0 | 26 |
2005 | St. Louis | 114 | 142 | 0 | .445 | 21.8 | 2 |
2006 | Chicago | 114 | 142 | 0 | .445 | 21.3 | 8 |
2010 | Arizona | 114 | 142 | 0 | .445 | 22.8 | 11 |
2008 | Denver | 114 | 142 | 0 | .445 | 22.1 | 18 |
2009 | Cleveland | 114 | 140 | 2 | .449 | 23.1 | 7 |
2002 | • Jacksonville | 115 | 141 | 0 | .449 | 21.2 | 24 |
2005 | Arizona | 115 | 141 | 0 | .449 | 21.8 | 3 |
2008 | Buffalo | 115 | 141 | 0 | .449 | 23.4 | 5 |
2010 | St. Louis | 115 | 141 | 0 | .449 | 23.5 | 6 |
2003 | Green Bay | 115 | 141 | 0 | .449 | 21.5 | 11 |
2006 | Green Bay | 115 | 141 | 0 | .449 | 20.7 | 16 |
2008 | New Orleans | 115 | 141 | 0 | .449 | 22.7 | 12 |
2003 | San Francisco | 115 | 140 | 1 | .451 | 21.2 | 15 |
2005 | Philadelphia | 116 | 140 | 0 | .453 | 20.8 | 15 |
2012 | • New England | 116 | 140 | 0 | .453 | 21.6 | 27 |
2014 | Jacksonville | 116 | 140 | 0 | .453 | 23.5 | 5 |
2010 | San Diego | 116 | 140 | 0 | .453 | 23.7 | 4 |
2008 | Kansas City | 116 | 140 | 0 | .453 | 21.7 | 20 |
2010 | Seattle | 116 | 140 | 0 | .453 | 22.3 | 15 |
So very little difference between the two, it seems. They’re about the same.
And as a final note, I looked at the average schedules from each year (the 30 ranking either 16th or 17th). That’s not entering the year, but what in reality happened. For those teams, they allowed an average of 22.0 points.
With the so-called easy schedules, we saw about 22.35 points. So we’re talking about an average of about a third of an NFL point per week. Over the course of a season, that’s adds up to just short of one touchdown – a 1.5 percent difference.
That’s the kind of “bonus” one can objectively expect from an easy schedule. The advantage would presumably become more pronounced if the numbers were re-run in September or October, when there is more current data on the teams. But SOS doesn’t look like the knockout silver bullet that will lift you to a championship.
—Ian Allan