Let me check in with a look at Strength of Schedule. Which teams have seen the easiest schedules so far? And who’s got a hard schedule coming up? Sifting through the data, the Denver Broncos are the team that attracts my attention.
For this version, I’m going to ignore the real-life factual data and instead use my gut feel opinion of each team. That is, first step is to create a 1 thru 32 “power ranking” of the teams, then plug those numbers into the actual NFL schedule.
So for starters, here’s how I rank the teams from best to worst. The win-loss records here aren’t how I feel they will finish. Instead they reflect how I think they would finish if the season started today and each team played an average, typical schedule.
There’s a little bit of a voodoo math element here, because teams change. Kansas City, for example, used to be a middle-of-the-pack team, but now Jamaal Charles is out for the year and they have no chance of finishing .500. Similarly, the Steelers and Cowboys might both be above-average teams when they’re at full strength, but they’re playing part of the year without their franchise quarterbacks.
But whatever. You’ve got to put them in some kind of order, and I’m going but what I have seen. The Patriots and Bengals seem like the best teams to me. I’ve got the Packers at No. 3. I’m putting Denver down at 4th; love the defense, but they haven’t made any progress at solving their extensive offensive issues.
There’s no clear “worst” team in my eyes. I think there are about a dozen teams down in that lesser group.
IAN'S POWER RANKINGS | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rk | Team | W | L | T | Pct |
1. | New England | 14 | 2 | 0 | .875 |
2. | Cincinnati | 13 | 3 | 0 | .813 |
3. | Green Bay | 12 | 3 | 1 | .781 |
4. | Denver | 11 | 4 | 1 | .719 |
5. | Arizona | 11 | 5 | 0 | .688 |
6. | Pittsburgh | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 |
7. | Carolina | 10 | 6 | 0 | .625 |
8. | Atlanta | 9 | 6 | 1 | .594 |
9. | Seattle | 9 | 6 | 1 | .594 |
10. | NY Jets | 9 | 6 | 1 | .594 |
11. | Minnesota | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
12. | Philadelphia | 9 | 7 | 0 | .563 |
13. | Indianapolis | 8 | 7 | 1 | .531 |
14. | San Diego | 8 | 7 | 1 | .531 |
15. | Buffalo | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
16. | Dallas | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
17. | NY Giants | 8 | 8 | 0 | .500 |
18. | St. Louis | 7 | 8 | 1 | .469 |
19. | Baltimore | 6 | 9 | 1 | .406 |
20. | Washington | 6 | 9 | 1 | .406 |
21. | New Orleans | 6 | 9 | 1 | .406 |
22. | Chicago | 6 | 9 | 1 | .406 |
23. | Oakland | 6 | 10 | 0 | .375 |
24. | Cleveland | 6 | 10 | 0 | .375 |
25. | San Francisco | 5 | 10 | 1 | .344 |
26. | Detroit | 5 | 10 | 1 | .344 |
27. | Miami | 5 | 10 | 1 | .344 |
28. | Kansas City | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 |
29. | Houston | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 |
30. | Tennessee | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 |
31. | Tampa Bay | 5 | 11 | 0 | .313 |
32. | Jacksonville | 4 | 11 | 1 | .281 |
As the next step in the process of this thing, let’s look at which teams have played the easiest schedules so far.
By my math, the Panthers, Bucs, Broncos and Titans have played the easiest schedules. Denver is undefeated, but it hasn’t played good teams yet. The Titans came out guns blazing in their opener, but they’ve lost 4 in a row despite playing an easy schedule.
At the other end of this deal, I’ve got the Rams, Kansas City, 49ers, Cowboys and Lions. Then you finally run into some good teams with the Chargers and Seahawks.
STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE, SO FAR (Weeks 1-6) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Team | W | L | T | Pct |
Carolina | 29 | 48 | 3 | .381 |
Tampa Bay | 30 | 48 | 2 | .388 |
Denver | 37 | 57 | 2 | .396 |
Tennessee | 32 | 46 | 2 | .413 |
Miami | 32 | 45 | 3 | .419 |
Arizona | 39 | 52 | 5 | .432 |
Houston | 41 | 52 | 3 | .443 |
Green Bay | 40 | 51 | 5 | .443 |
NY Jets | 34 | 43 | 3 | .444 |
Atlanta | 42 | 52 | 2 | .448 |
Minnesota | 34 | 42 | 4 | .450 |
Cincinnati | 42 | 51 | 3 | .453 |
Indianapolis | 45 | 49 | 2 | .479 |
NY Giants | 45 | 48 | 3 | .484 |
New England | 38 | 40 | 2 | .488 |
Cleveland | 45 | 47 | 4 | .490 |
Jacksonville | 47 | 47 | 2 | .500 |
Philadelphia | 46 | 46 | 4 | .500 |
Washington | 47 | 45 | 4 | .510 |
Chicago | 48 | 45 | 3 | .516 |
Baltimore | 51 | 43 | 2 | .542 |
Oakland | 42 | 35 | 3 | .544 |
New Orleans | 52 | 43 | 1 | .547 |
Pittsburgh | 51 | 41 | 4 | .552 |
Buffalo | 53 | 41 | 2 | .563 |
Seattle | 53 | 39 | 4 | .573 |
San Diego | 55 | 39 | 2 | .583 |
Detroit | 54 | 38 | 4 | .583 |
Dallas | 46 | 32 | 2 | .588 |
San Francisco | 56 | 38 | 2 | .594 |
Kansas City | 56 | 37 | 3 | .599 |
St. Louis | 48 | 29 | 3 | .619 |
Shifting to the remaining schedule, I see Saints, Chargers and Falcons at the top. Those are the teams that I believe will benefit from playing easy schedules in the remaining 11 weeks.
At the other end of this deal, I see Broncos, Browns, Dolphins, Cardinals and Vikings. I think those teams will be hurt by the quality of their remaining schedule.
Denver, recall, was in the group that so far has seen easy schedules. So to me, that looks like a team that’s ripe to slip by a notch going forward. The Browns have been an offensive surprise, but scheduling will make it tough to keep that run going.
STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE, REMAINING (Weeks 7-17) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
Team | W | L | T | Pct |
New Orleans | 65 | 90 | 5 | .422 |
San Diego | 65 | 89 | 6 | .425 |
Atlanta | 67 | 89 | 4 | .431 |
Jacksonville | 69 | 85 | 6 | .450 |
Indianapolis | 70 | 85 | 5 | .453 |
Tennessee | 80 | 90 | 6 | .472 |
New England | 80 | 90 | 6 | .472 |
St. Louis | 80 | 90 | 6 | .472 |
Buffalo | 74 | 81 | 5 | .478 |
Kansas City | 74 | 81 | 5 | .478 |
NY Jets | 85 | 89 | 2 | .489 |
Cincinnati | 77 | 79 | 4 | .494 |
Houston | 77 | 78 | 5 | .497 |
Carolina | 85 | 85 | 6 | .500 |
Seattle | 78 | 78 | 4 | .500 |
Detroit | 77 | 77 | 6 | .500 |
Chicago | 77 | 76 | 7 | .503 |
Baltimore | 78 | 77 | 5 | .503 |
Tampa Bay | 86 | 83 | 7 | .509 |
Philadelphia | 80 | 77 | 3 | .509 |
Oakland | 87 | 83 | 6 | .511 |
Dallas | 87 | 83 | 6 | .511 |
Green Bay | 80 | 76 | 4 | .513 |
NY Giants | 81 | 75 | 4 | .519 |
Washington | 82 | 76 | 2 | .519 |
Pittsburgh | 83 | 73 | 4 | .531 |
San Francisco | 82 | 71 | 7 | .534 |
Minnesota | 91 | 77 | 8 | .540 |
Arizona | 85 | 69 | 6 | .550 |
Miami | 97 | 75 | 4 | .563 |
Cleveland | 89 | 67 | 4 | .569 |
Denver | 90 | 65 | 5 | .578 |
—Ian Allan