I notice that receiving production was spread out more last year. That is, the best receivers weren’t as good as usual, and the later receivers were a lot better.
Look, for example, at the best receivers from the last 20 years. Jordy Nelson was No. 1 in 2016, but when compared against the last 20 years, he finished with better numbers than only two of those guys (2006 Marvin Harrison and 1997 Rob Moore).
PRODUCTION OF BEST RECEIVERS (1997-2016) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Year | Player | No | Yards | Avg | TD | Points |
2007 | Randy Moss, N.E. | 98 | 1493 | 15.2 | 23 | 287.3 |
2003 | Randy Moss, Minn. | 111 | 1632 | 14.7 | 17 | 265.2 |
2011 | Calvin Johnson, Det. | 96 | 1681 | 17.5 | 16 | 264.1 |
2014 | Antonio Brown, Pitt. | 129 | 1698 | 13.2 | 14 | 259.8 |
2015 | Antonio Brown, Pitt. | 136 | 1834 | 13.5 | 11 | 253.4 |
2001 | Marvin Harrison, Ind. | 109 | 1524 | 14.0 | 15 | 242.4 |
1999 | Marvin Harrison, Ind. | 115 | 1663 | 14.5 | 12 | 240.3 |
2002 | Marvin Harrison, Ind. | 143 | 1722 | 12.0 | 11 | 240.2 |
1998 | Randy Moss, Minn. | 68 | 1313 | 19.3 | 17 | 237.3 |
2004 | Muhsin Muhammad, Car. | 93 | 1405 | 15.1 | 16 | 236.5 |
2000 | Randy Moss, Minn. | 77 | 1437 | 18.7 | 15 | 235.7 |
2005 | Steve Smith Sr., Car. | 103 | 1563 | 15.2 | 13 | 234.3 |
2013 | Demaryius Thomas, Den. | 92 | 1430 | 15.5 | 14 | 227.0 |
2012 | Calvin Johnson, Det. | 122 | 1964 | 16.1 | 5 | 226.4 |
2008 | Larry Fitzgerald, Ariz. | 96 | 1431 | 14.9 | 12 | 215.1 |
2009 | Andre Johnson, Hou. | 101 | 1569 | 15.5 | 9 | 212.9 |
2010 | Brandon Lloyd, Den. | 77 | 1448 | 18.8 | 11 | 210.8 |
2016 | Jordy Nelson, G.B. | 97 | 1257 | 13.0 | 14 | 209.7 |
2006 | Marvin Harrison, Ind. | 95 | 1366 | 14.4 | 12 | 208.6 |
1997 | Rob Moore, Ariz. | 97 | 1584 | 16.3 | 8 | 208.4 |
If you follow that process for all of the top 20 receivers (comparing all of the No. 2 guys, then all of the No. 3s, and so on) then all of them are beaten by most of the entries from the other seasons. Of the first 20 receivers, all but four of them rank in the bottom 3.
That’s weird, with passing production generally going up. You would figure most of those top 20 would be better than seasons in the late ‘90s or early in the century (when NFL teams weren’t passing for as many yards or touchdowns).
But the top receivers were down pretty much across the board. It starts changing in the 20s, and then gets really flipped around starting at No. 30. Look at wide receivers 30 thru 50 – those 21 players all ranked either first or next-to-first relative to the last 20 years.
HOW 2016 RECEIVERS FARED RELATIVE TO LAST 20 YEARS | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rk | Player | No | Yards | Avg | TD | Points | Place |
1 | Jordy Nelson, G.B. | 97 | 1257 | 13.0 | 14 | 209.7 | 18 |
2 | Mike Evans, T.B. | 96 | 1321 | 13.8 | 12 | 208.1 | 14 |
3 | Antonio Brown, Pitt. | 106 | 1284 | 12.1 | 12 | 200.4 | 16 |
4 | Odell Beckham Jr., NYG | 101 | 1367 | 13.5 | 10 | 196.7 | 13 |
5 | T.Y. Hilton, Ind. | 91 | 1448 | 15.9 | 6 | 182.8 | 16 |
6 | Julio Jones, Atl. | 83 | 1409 | 17.0 | 6 | 176.9 | 20 |
7 | Davante Adams, G.B. | 75 | 997 | 13.3 | 12 | 173.7 | 18 |
8 | Michael Thomas, N.O. | 92 | 1137 | 12.4 | 9 | 167.7 | 18 |
9 | Brandin Cooks, N.O. | 78 | 1173 | 15.0 | 8 | 165.3 | 19 |
10 | Doug Baldwin, Sea. | 94 | 1128 | 12.0 | 7 | 158.8 | 20 |
11 | Michael Crabtree, Oak. | 89 | 1003 | 11.3 | 8 | 150.3 | 20 |
12 | Amari Cooper, Oak. | 83 | 1153 | 13.9 | 5 | 149.3 | 20 |
13 | Rishard Matthews, Tenn. | 65 | 945 | 14.5 | 9 | 148.5 | 20 |
14 | Tyrell Williams, S.D. | 69 | 1059 | 15.3 | 7 | 147.9 | 20 |
15 | Demaryius Thomas, Den. | 90 | 1083 | 12.0 | 5 | 140.3 | 20 |
16 | Jarvis Landry, Mia. | 94 | 1136 | 12.1 | 4 | 139.6 | 19 |
17 | Larry Fitzgerald, Ariz. | 107 | 1023 | 9.6 | 6 | 138.3 | 19 |
18 | Kelvin Benjamin, Car. | 63 | 941 | 14.9 | 7 | 136.1 | 18 |
19 | Golden Tate, Det. | 91 | 1077 | 11.8 | 4 | 133.7 | 18 |
20 | Emmanuel Sanders, Den. | 79 | 1032 | 13.1 | 5 | 133.2 | 18 |
21 | Jamison Crowder, Wash. | 67 | 847 | 12.6 | 8 | 132.7 | 16 |
22 | Terrelle Pryor, Clev. | 77 | 1007 | 13.1 | 5 | 132.7 | 11 |
23 | Dez Bryant, Dall. | 50 | 796 | 15.9 | 8 | 131.6 | 10 |
24 | Tyreek Hill, K.C. | 61 | 593 | 9.7 | 12 | 131.3 | 7 |
25 | Julian Edelman, N.E. | 98 | 1106 | 11.3 | 3 | 130.6 | 7 |
26 | Kenny Britt, L.A. | 68 | 1002 | 14.7 | 5 | 130.2 | 7 |
27 | Mike Wallace, Balt. | 72 | 1017 | 14.1 | 4 | 127.7 | 6 |
28 | Adam Thielen, Minn. | 69 | 967 | 14.0 | 5 | 126.7 | 5 |
29 | Kenny Stills, Mia. | 42 | 726 | 17.3 | 9 | 126.6 | 3 |
30 | Allen Robinson, Jac. | 73 | 883 | 12.1 | 6 | 126.3 | 2 |
31 | DeSean Jackson, Wash. | 56 | 1005 | 17.9 | 4 | 124.5 | 1 |
32 | Brandon LaFell, Cin. | 64 | 862 | 13.5 | 6 | 122.2 | 2 |
33 | Pierre Garcon, Wash. | 79 | 1041 | 13.2 | 3 | 122.1 | 2 |
34 | A.J. Green, Cin. | 66 | 964 | 14.6 | 4 | 120.4 | 1 |
35 | DeAndre Hopkins, Hou. | 78 | 954 | 12.2 | 4 | 119.4 | 1 |
36 | Willie Snead, N.O. | 72 | 895 | 12.4 | 4 | 117.5 | 1 |
37 | Marvin Jones, Det. | 55 | 930 | 16.9 | 4 | 117.0 | 1 |
38 | Cameron Meredith, Chi. | 66 | 888 | 13.5 | 4 | 116.8 | 1 |
39 | Sterling Shepard, NYG | 65 | 683 | 10.5 | 8 | 116.3 | 1 |
40 | Steve Smith Sr., Balt. | 70 | 799 | 11.4 | 5 | 113.9 | 1 |
41 | Cole Beasley, Dall. | 75 | 833 | 11.1 | 5 | 113.3 | 1 |
42 | Marqise Lee, Jac. | 63 | 851 | 13.5 | 4 | 113.1 | 1 |
43 | Quincy Enunwa, NYJ | 58 | 857 | 14.8 | 4 | 109.7 | 1 |
44 | Stefon Diggs, Minn. | 84 | 903 | 10.8 | 3 | 108.3 | 1 |
45 | Anquan Boldin, Det. | 67 | 584 | 8.7 | 8 | 106.4 | 1 |
46 | Dontrelle Inman, S.D. | 58 | 810 | 14.0 | 4 | 105.0 | 1 |
47 | Taylor Gabriel, Atl. | 35 | 579 | 16.5 | 7 | 99.9 | 2 |
48 | Ted Ginn Jr., Car. | 54 | 752 | 13.9 | 4 | 99.2 | 2 |
49 | J.J. Nelson, Ariz. | 34 | 568 | 16.7 | 7 | 98.8 | 2 |
50 | DeVante Parker, Mia. | 56 | 744 | 13.3 | 4 | 98.4 | 1 |
It’s kind of interesting. Sort of, anyway. What’s driving this? Is it a situation where more teams are using more multiple-receiver sets, causing stats to be spread around more? It looks that way. (And that would change how we all value wide receivers in fantasy drafts.)
But I’m not there yet. If you look at the 2014 and 2015 numbers, you’ll see those top 20 receivers putting up great numbers – the appropriate numbers you would expect. If we were shifting to more multiple-receiver sets and more spreading the ball around, I think it would have shown up more in those last two years.
So I think we just got hit with an outlier year. Julio Jones, Demaryius Thomas, Larry Fitzgerald, T.Y. Hilton, Amari Cooper and A.J. Green, for example, all failed to score more than 6 TDs. So rather than a shift in the NFL landscape, I believe things will settle down this year, meaning we’ll get much better production from those standout receivers in the top 15-20.
Here, if you’re curious, are the 2015 numbers (showing how the fared relative to the last 20 years). I won’t bother posting the 2014.
For these charts, by the way, they show just receiving yards. If a player ran for 50 or 150 yards, that’s not included. But touchdowns include receiving, rushing and returns.
HOW 2015 RECEIVERS FARED RELATIVE TO LAST 20 YEARS | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rk | Player | No | Yards | Avg | TD | Points | Place |
1 | Antonio Brown, Pitt. | 136 | 1834 | 13.5 | 11 | 253.4 | 5 |
2 | Julio Jones, Atl. | 136 | 1871 | 13.8 | 9 | 241.1 | 2 |
3 | Brandon Marshall, NYJ | 109 | 1502 | 13.8 | 14 | 234.2 | 1 |
4 | Allen Robinson, Jac. | 80 | 1400 | 17.5 | 14 | 224.0 | 2 |
5 | Odell Beckham Jr., NYG | 96 | 1450 | 15.1 | 13 | 223.0 | 1 |
6 | DeAndre Hopkins, Hou. | 111 | 1521 | 13.7 | 11 | 220.1 | 1 |
7 | Doug Baldwin, Sea. | 78 | 1069 | 13.7 | 14 | 190.9 | 5 |
8 | A.J. Green, Cin. | 86 | 1297 | 15.1 | 10 | 189.7 | 4 |
9 | Larry Fitzgerald, Ariz. | 109 | 1215 | 11.2 | 9 | 175.5 | 8 |
10 | Calvin Johnson, Det. | 88 | 1214 | 13.8 | 9 | 175.4 | 6 |
11 | Eric Decker, NYJ | 80 | 1027 | 12.8 | 12 | 174.7 | 5 |
12 | Brandin Cooks, N.O. | 84 | 1138 | 13.6 | 9 | 167.8 | 5 |
13 | Demaryius Thomas, Den. | 105 | 1304 | 12.4 | 6 | 166.4 | 2 |
14 | Allen Hurns, Jac. | 64 | 1031 | 16.1 | 10 | 163.1 | 3 |
15 | Sammy Watkins, Buff. | 60 | 1047 | 17.5 | 9 | 158.7 | 4 |
16 | Jeremy Maclin, K.C. | 87 | 1088 | 12.5 | 8 | 156.8 | 3 |
17 | Jarvis Landry, Mia. | 110 | 1157 | 10.5 | 6 | 153.7 | 2 |
18 | Emmanuel Sanders, Den. | 76 | 1135 | 14.9 | 6 | 149.5 | 2 |
19 | Jordan Matthews, Phil. | 85 | 997 | 11.7 | 8 | 147.7 | 2 |
20 | Michael Crabtree, Oak. | 85 | 922 | 10.9 | 9 | 146.2 | 2 |
21 | Amari Cooper, Oak. | 72 | 1070 | 14.9 | 6 | 143.0 | 2 |
22 | T.Y. Hilton, Ind. | 69 | 1124 | 16.3 | 5 | 142.4 | 3 |
23 | John Brown, Ariz. | 65 | 1003 | 15.4 | 7 | 142.3 | 2 |
24 | James Jones, G.B. | 50 | 890 | 17.8 | 8 | 141.0 | 2 |
25 | Mike Evans, T.B. | 74 | 1206 | 16.3 | 3 | 138.6 | 2 |
26 | Ted Ginn Jr., Car. | 44 | 739 | 16.8 | 10 | 133.9 | 4 |
27 | Travis Benjamin, Clev. | 68 | 966 | 14.2 | 6 | 132.6 | 3 |
28 | Rueben Randle, NYG | 57 | 797 | 14.0 | 8 | 127.7 | 4 |
29 | Randall Cobb, G.B. | 79 | 829 | 10.5 | 7 | 124.9 | 5 |
30 | Kamar Aiken, Balt. | 75 | 944 | 12.6 | 5 | 124.4 | 4 |
31 | Michael Floyd, Ariz. | 52 | 849 | 16.3 | 6 | 120.9 | 6 |
32 | Martavis Bryant, Pitt. | 50 | 765 | 15.3 | 7 | 118.5 | 8 |
33 | Golden Tate, Det. | 90 | 813 | 9.0 | 6 | 117.3 | 5 |
34 | Willie Snead, N.O. | 69 | 984 | 14.3 | 3 | 116.4 | 4 |
35 | Tyler Lockett, Sea. | 51 | 664 | 13.0 | 8 | 114.4 | 4 |
36 | Pierre Garcon, Wash. | 72 | 777 | 10.8 | 6 | 113.7 | 3 |
37 | Julian Edelman, N.E. | 61 | 692 | 11.3 | 7 | 111.2 | 4 |
38 | Donte Moncrief, Ind. | 64 | 733 | 11.5 | 6 | 109.3 | 4 |
39 | Tavon Austin, St.L. | 52 | 473 | 9.1 | 10 | 107.3 | 4 |
40 | Markus Wheaton, Pitt. | 44 | 749 | 17.0 | 5 | 106.9 | 3 |
41 | Marvin Jones, Cin. | 65 | 816 | 12.6 | 4 | 105.6 | 3 |
42 | Alshon Jeffery, Chi. | 54 | 807 | 14.9 | 4 | 104.7 | 3 |
43 | Anquan Boldin, S.F. | 69 | 789 | 11.4 | 4 | 102.9 | 3 |
44 | Terrance Williams, Dall. | 52 | 840 | 16.2 | 3 | 102.0 | 4 |
45 | Jermaine Kearse, Sea. | 49 | 685 | 14.0 | 5 | 98.5 | 5 |
46 | Keenan Allen, S.D. | 67 | 725 | 10.8 | 4 | 96.5 | 6 |
47 | Stefon Diggs, Minn. | 52 | 720 | 13.9 | 4 | 96.0 | 5 |
48 | Torrey Smith, S.F. | 33 | 663 | 20.1 | 4 | 92.3 | 8 |
49 | Rishard Matthews, Mia. | 43 | 662 | 15.4 | 4 | 90.2 | 7 |
50 | Nate Washington, Hou. | 47 | 658 | 14.0 | 4 | 89.8 | 7 |